Quote:
Originally Posted by eastcoastal
I agree in theory... often trying to tie in to existing heritage fabric results in chintzy weirdo design moves that read as ill-considered.
I do not agree in the result here: I think it's a lovely little building that looks nice on its own, and raises the appeal of its somewhat dilapidated neighbours. In particular, I think the brick works well as a texture (hand-sized units arranged together) next to the smooth planes of glass - something I don't think more glass or another monolithic cladding would provide.
|
Exactly, it's not a fussy faux-heritage design flourish, like some fake dormers or doric columns. Instead it's a very subtle extension of the neighbouring brick wall, in colour and massing, that sort of fades into the new building. It looks very contemporary, while indicating that this is a developer/architect who's trying to tie his building harmoniously into the existing block.
It's thoughtful architecture that gains more every time you look at it. We need more of it in this town! I'm a staunch defender of Barrington as a heritage district, but this building is a great shot of contemporary architecture to contrast all the old buildings with. I think it turned out better than the renderings, even.