HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Business, Politics & the Economy


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #241  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2014, 7:00 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,806
Quote:
Originally Posted by coalminecanary View Post
this is why we shouldn't be focussed on building parking lots at hunter or building new go stations to get hamiltonians to toronto. we should be focussed on making downtown hamilton a destination for the GHA instead of a suburb of gta.

this is great news and hopefully the start of big changes
Burlington will continue providing a major amount of Hamilton's employment for a while, so we might as well try to encourage people to take transit to it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #242  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2014, 12:39 AM
CaptainKirk CaptainKirk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beedok View Post
Burlington will continue providing a major amount of Hamilton's employment for a while, so we might as well try to encourage people to take transit to it.
Forgive me, not sure what you mean.

If you mean Hamiltonians working ion Burlington, then I'm not sure how practical transit to Burlington would be because I would think that Burlington employment is spread out all over the various QEW exits and service roads rather than a downtown cluster.

I believe Burlington employment lands were designed to be car-centric, no?

Don't know for sure, just going by personal observation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #243  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2014, 1:15 AM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,806
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainKirk View Post
Forgive me, not sure what you mean.

If you mean Hamiltonians working ion Burlington, then I'm not sure how practical transit to Burlington would be because I would think that Burlington employment is spread out all over the various QEW exits and service roads rather than a downtown cluster.

I believe Burlington employment lands were designed to be car-centric, no?

Don't know for sure, just going by personal observation.
If Hamilton is better connected to GO transit it will make sense for Burlington to make connections from it's stations to the employment areas better. Then some people will be working in the GTA as well. We should try to get more people working in Hamilton, but also accept that the Golden Horseshoe region is a network of cities and we'll all have ingoing and outgoing commuters and should try to make that commuting as transit oriented as possible.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #244  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2014, 6:26 PM
Jon Dalton's Avatar
Jon Dalton Jon Dalton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,778
Transit to Burlington is already pretty good. GO buses leave for Aldershot and Burlington at least every half hour, more in peak times. It's getting to your final destination that is tricky. Most areas are served by Burlington Transit buses running out of the 3 GO stations, but you could be waiting 40 minutes for that bus. Using a bike for that part of the trip can really speed things up.
__________________
360º of Hamilton
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #245  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2014, 6:37 PM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,527
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Dalton View Post
Transit to Burlington is already pretty good. GO buses leave for Aldershot and Burlington at least every half hour, more in peak times. It's getting to your final destination that is tricky. Most areas are served by Burlington Transit buses running out of the 3 GO stations, but you could be waiting 40 minutes for that bus. Using a bike for that part of the trip can really speed things up.
Transit frequency is so important. Politicians don't seem to understand that (especially in Burlington).

I'm not sure what most routes are like lately, but to Burlington Transit's credit they have added some late-night services. Used to be that if you got off the train too late in the evening you were out of luck finding a connecting bus home.

They do have lines running along Harvester, North Service Rd. and Mainway, but some of them are still only rush-hour service and there are big gaps in coverage for parts of that massive industrial zone.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #246  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2014, 9:47 PM
drpgq drpgq is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hamilton/Dresden
Posts: 1,808
Quote:
Originally Posted by HillStreetBlues View Post
These were the assumed adult cash fares in the business case:

1A: Hamilton via McMaster $7.25
1B: Hamilton via Mohawk $7.25
2: Aldershot via McMaster $7.70
3: Cambridge (Ainslie Street) $5.65

90 daily riders were estimated (in year one) on option 1A.
Thanks for the info. I wonder what other GO routes could connect to Hamilton. Maybe London, but that's quite far.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #247  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2014, 11:37 AM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,728
Great city? Planner wants to help Hamilton get there
(Hamilton Spectator, Matthew Van Dongen, Apr 25 2014)

Hamilton has hired a former architect of the Big Move regional transportation plan ahead of a looming council decision on the future of light rail transit in the city.

Jason Thorne is the city's new general manager of planning and economic development. The 40-year-old principal planner with international firm planningAlliance expects to start his new job by the end of May, replacing retired veteran bureaucrat Tim McCabe.

Thorne also led development in 2008 of the Metrolinx Big Move plan, a blueprint for regional transportation that focused on improved rapid transit in the GTA and Hamilton.

He declined to weigh in on the increasingly divisive debate over LRT in the lead-up to next week's provincial budget, but added council's commitment to complete streets and a "transit-friendly city" was a factor in his decision to take the job.

"Great cities have great transit and transportation systems," Thorne said. "I want to help Hamilton get there."

The Wednesday announcement of Thorne's hiring was applauded online by a diverse range of community groups and advocates, from Environment Hamilton to community foundation president Terry Cooke.

Businessman and social activist Mark Chamberlain worked with Thorne as part of a Big Move advisory committee and hailed his arrival in Hamilton as "critical at this time" — and not just because of the transit debate.

"He has that broad view of community building that we need … He's not just about transportation. He's not a one-trick pony," said Chamberlain, noting Thorne also worked on provincial growth planning and with the Coalition on the Niagara Escarpment and the Bay Area Restoration Council.

City manager Chris Murray called his new hire a "smart, strategic thinker" at council and welcomed his youth, energy and passion. He predicted, tongue-in-cheek, that everyone will "look up" to Thorne, only partly because he is 6-foot-7.

The bulk of Thorne's work experience has been in planning rather than in economic development, but he said Thursday the two responsibilities are "often tightly knit," pointing to his resource development work in Alberta and overseas.

The father of two, who grew up here and graduated from Sir Allan MacNab, said he's excited about tackling hometown priorities like waterfront redevelopment.

"It's a very rare privilege to be able to take on this sort of position in the town you grew up in."
__________________
"Where architectural imagination is absent, the case is hopeless." - Louis Sullivan
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #248  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2014, 11:58 AM
Dr Awesomesauce's Avatar
Dr Awesomesauce Dr Awesomesauce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: BEYOND THE OUTER RIM
Posts: 5,889
I like him already. Seems like a savvy move by the City.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #249  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2014, 1:14 PM
oldcoote's Avatar
oldcoote oldcoote is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 627
Would have loved to see Jennifer Keesmaat here, but he sounds interesting.
__________________
There are no great cities in the world that are easy to drive through.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #250  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2014, 6:45 PM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,728
Not sure I've seen this quantified in this way before. Imperfect methodology but good fodder for debate:

Reed Construction Data has compiled a ranking of 15 Ontario cities according to manufacturing job losses, and Hamilton showcases dramatic impacts, registering some of the most severe losses in the province and ranking worst in the pack.

According to RCD analysis of StatsCan data, manufacturing jobs made up 22.4% of jobs in the Hamilton CMA in May 2004 and just 11.7% in May 2014. That's 36,100 jobs lost in the city's manufacturing sector over the last decade, a 44.7% drop in sector employment.
__________________
"Where architectural imagination is absent, the case is hopeless." - Louis Sullivan
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #251  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2014, 8:04 PM
Gurnett71 Gurnett71 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 199
Considering that Stelco declared bankruptcy in 2004, restructured, and was sold to US Steel in 2007 who closed down Hilton Works last year, the numbers don't seem to be too out of line. Not sure how many were employed at Hilton Works pre-2004 but the turmoil that Stelco endured through this decade could account for perhaps a quarter to a third of the 36,000 lost jobs alone.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #252  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2014, 11:30 AM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,728
Next Friday:



Supercrawl expands its community programming with a dynamic new event open to all. Architecture + Commerce brings together an expert panel to share professional and personal insights on architecture as an economic driver. This topic is timely as all parts of Hamilton – especially our historic lower city – manage an exciting period of development and redevelopment. How does inspired urban architecture and design contribute to local prosperity and quality of life? What’s the ROI on creative placemaking? These and other questions will be tackled in a fast-paced PechaKucha "20x20" format that limits each presenter to 20 images and 20 seconds per image. This event promises to be fun, interactive and informative. It's hosted by the Ontario Association of Architects in partnership with the Hamilton/Burlington Society of Architects and The Renew Hamilton Project. Space is limited, so secure your spot by emailing RSVP@kimgraham.ca.
__________________
"Where architectural imagination is absent, the case is hopeless." - Louis Sullivan
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #253  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2014, 3:37 AM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,728
Hamilton 'struggling' to attract newcomers
(CBC Hamilton, Sept 18 2014)

Hamilton earned a “D” grade and ranked low on a list of the most attractive Canadian cities for newcomers.

The Conference Board of Canada released the 2014 version of its City Magnets report on Thursday, which factors in 43 different categories including heath, education, economy and housing. Overall, Hamilton finished 42nd out of 50 Canadian cities, both large and small, in terms of attractiveness to newcomers. In the same report in 2010, Hamilton had a "C" rating.

Overall, Hamilton did well in terms of health — it was one of just three large cities to earn a “B” grade and finished 12th overall — but did poorly in a number of other categories. That’s bad news for the city’s future, the study’s authors warned.

“Cities that fail to attract new people will struggle to stay prosperous and vibrant," said Alan Arcand, of the board’s Centre for Municipal Studies in a news release.

In other categories, Hamilton finished:

• 44th in economy. Grade: C.
• 37th in environment. Grade: B.
• 26th in education. Grade: C.
• 36th in housing. Grade: C.
• 43rd in innovation. Grade: D.

“Without question, the ‘D’ cities are struggling,” the report reads, pointing out they’re unattractive destinations for migrants with or without university degrees.

Hamilton is one of 10 Ontario cities in this category, but along with Brampton it’s one of the largest. Smaller cities nearby, including St. Catharines, Brantford and Cambridge, also earned “D” grades.

Read oit in full here
__________________
"Where architectural imagination is absent, the case is hopeless." - Louis Sullivan
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #254  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2014, 1:40 PM
CaptainKirk CaptainKirk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by thistleclub View Post
Hamilton earned a “D” grade and ranked low on a list of the most attractive Canadian cities for newcomers.
Hmmmm...Would be interesting to see up to date numbers.

Quote:
Alan Arcand, author of the Conference Board report, said it is based on data from the 2006 to 2011 census — and acknowledged some of the indicators may be a bit outdated.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #255  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2014, 2:49 PM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,728
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainKirk View Post
Hmmmm...Would be interesting to see up to date numbers.
The 2016 census will definitely provide a better sense of things, though if the outdated indicators themselves are refreshed, we may not have have a working comparative until 2021.
__________________
"Where architectural imagination is absent, the case is hopeless." - Louis Sullivan
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #256  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2014, 1:24 PM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,728
Hamilton as the Next Pittsburgh? Hold the Phone
(The Inside Agenda Blog, Steve Paikin, Oct 3 2014)

Earlier this week, The Agenda did a segment focusing on US Steel Canada seeking bankruptcy protection and what that might do to the thousands of pensioners depending on those pensions being honoured. We also spent a fair amount of time talking about Hamilton's economy, where US Steel has one of its plants.

When I grew up in Hamilton in the 1960s and 1970s, Stelco (as it then was) employed 25,000 people. Today, 90 per cent of those workers are no longer there.

It raised a question among our guests: should Hamilton try to model itself after Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, which used to be the steel-making capital of the United States, but now markets itself as a tourism, culture, and higher education destination?

Not so fast, says the Mayor of Hamilton, Bob Bratina, who has heard the question posited too many times.

"The suggestion that Pittsburgh is a model for Hamilton cannot go unchallenged," Bratina says.

The mayor points out the following:

• Pittsburgh exists under Pennsylvania's "Financially Distressed Municipalities Act" to try to deal with its $400 million operating budget, in deficit by $90 million.
• Pittsburgh's population actually decreased last year -- the only major metropolitan area in the U.S. to experience that. Its population is actually lower today than it was in 1894. In the last 13 years, it's lost 7000 residents. Its population today is 305,000.

Conversely:

• Hamilton, whose population is above 500,000, has issued more than $1 billion in building permits for the last three consecutive years.
• Hamilton has the lowest unemployment rate and youth unemployment rate of any big city in Ontario.
• Manufacturing continues to be the most significant sector in Hamilton's employment scene with 23,000 employees.

"There are 30 blast furnaces in the North American steel industry," Bratina points out, "and three of them are in Hamilton. We still produce 60 per cent of Canada's steel." (While the old Stelco Hilton Works plant makes no more steel, Arcelor Mittal Dofasco is thriving right next door).

One expects the mayor to be a booster for his community and Bratina, who's not running for re-election but instead is seeking a Hamilton-area Liberal nomination for the next federal election, is no exception. Still, he says an Atlanta-based magazine looked at Canada's best locations to invest and discovered Hamilton had 20 "new or expansion projects with at least $1 million invested, at least 50 new jobs created, or at least 20,000 new square feet between June 2011 and May 2012." Quebec City had 16. Toronto had 15.

It does seem fashionable to point out that Hamilton's arts and culture scene has grown by leaps and bounds in the past decade. Many neighborhoods are great, and unlike Toronto, homes are affordable to purchase. But Bratina admonishes us not to forget about the city's manufacturing core.

"I won't let the steel lands be turned into a playground for Ducks Unlimited," he says. "We need those factories there and I love 'em."

And in case we didn't yet get the point about Pittsburgh:

"I would be happy to have our economic development staff share with Pittsburgh insights as to how Hamilton has revitalized and flourished in the decade of their decline," says the mayor.
__________________
"Where architectural imagination is absent, the case is hopeless." - Louis Sullivan
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #257  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2014, 3:15 PM
king10 king10 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 2,764
exciting times for Hamilton. still lots of work and progress to be made.

but I am proud to be a Hamiltonian and the future looks promising
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #258  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2014, 5:31 PM
Jon Dalton's Avatar
Jon Dalton Jon Dalton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,778
Interesting numbers for Pittsburgh:

Quote:
In the last 13 years, it's lost 7000 residents. Its population today is 305,000.

Conversely:

• Hamilton, whose population is above 500,000
It sounds like he is quoting City numbers rather than metro numbers, in which case Pittsburgh is lower because it hasn't amalgamated with its suburbs. Even still a decline of 7000 is surprising. I guess they aren't building a lot of condo towers in Pittsburgh.
__________________
360º of Hamilton
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #259  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2014, 6:43 PM
drpgq drpgq is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hamilton/Dresden
Posts: 1,808
I've actually wondered what the percentage of steel that's made in Canada. 60% is pretty high.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #260  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2015, 10:41 PM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,728
City's long-term debt will triple by 2017
(CBC Hamilton, Samantha Craggs, Jan 29 2015)

The city’s long-term debt is expected to reach nearly $1 billion by 2017, which is triple what it was in 2013. And soon, one-seventh of your water bill will go toward paying for it.

City councillors heard on Monday that as of Dec. 31, the city’s long-term debt was about $360 million. That will balloon over the next two years to be $897 million in 2017. That’s a threefold increase from 2013, when it was $294 million.

The main issue is more than $300 million in upgrades and expansions to the Woodward Avenue water and wastewater treatment plants, said Mike Zegarac, head of finance.

Currently, about $40 on an average annual water bill of $600 goes toward paying down debt, he said. By 2019, the average annual household water bill will be $700, and $100 will go toward paying down the city’s debt.

The debt is necessary, he said, for the treatment plant improvements, which will “benefit multiple generations, so we’re debt financing that particular project over 20 years.”


Read it in full here.
__________________
"Where architectural imagination is absent, the case is hopeless." - Louis Sullivan
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Business, Politics & the Economy
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:30 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.