Quote:
Originally Posted by RoshanMcG
It's my understanding that Stillwell was granted that space without there being a public bid for it, which isn't allowed, and so this year a public bid was introduced and other businesses, including Stillwell were able to bid on the space, and it was ultimately given to the Stubborn Goat.
Seems to me like this is fair in the long run, and Stillwell have the government to blame for their error.
|
There wasn't a tender originally, because no one believed it would be successful. Stillwell's spent the summer spending big, investing, to establish proof of concept.
Through their own innovation, hard work, and investment, they created a massive increase in value for that area. And their reward? The Government gives the contract to someone else.
You also cannot say it was "fair" because we have absolutely no idea how the criteria was applied and what method of evaluation was used. They have not released the basis of the decision.
I'm sure it was "fair" just like the bogus tendering process for the Imagine Bloomfield, which was obviously rigged for the Provincial Bid as it placed a disproportionate weight on "financial backing" which meant the provincial gov backed Housing NS bid that had zero vision, zero compliance with specifications, won anyways because it (obviously) had the most financial backing vs private sector firms.