Quote:
Originally Posted by scryer
I'm generally all for a good highrise that puts more people downtown. But the only thing that concerns me is that a bland concrete tower is being constructed on a riverfront property... I'm no expert but what does that say about our land-value in the area? If I'm not mistaken, in major cities, river/waterfront properties tend to be more desirable therefore more expensive.
Food for thought?
|
Yes, some cities have highly developed riverfront areas that are highly valued. However, such a situation will not happen in Winnipeg for a couple reasons.
First, unlike say Edmonton or Calgary where the river provides beautiful valley vistas even for people well back from the river, glaciers have scrapped Winnipeg flatter than a pancake (contrary to public belief, Winnipeg is far, far flatter than the flatlands of Saskatchewan). Therefore only the closest building gets to even see the river, and what they see is really just a stream level with the ground, nothing spectacular.
Second, the rivers in Winnipeg are rightly feared. They are forces of nature and have the power to destroy everything we've made here with their flooding. Because the areas near the river are covered by water every year which keeps them out of service often for half the summer and then deposits a thick layer of mud on them, the flood prone areas can't be extensively developed.
Put one and two together and you get a situation where if you are close enough to see the river you are too close to develop. For these reasons, Winnipeg will never be a river-facing city like so many in the world, and longing to make it that will only lead us to make poor decisions- ie. developing land best left to the waters. Of course you can enjoy the rivers from the top of a high-rise built anywhere in the city!