Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila
^ But everything on the north end of the park is flooded with sunlight, in the summertime until about 6 or 7.
I mean, obviously if you built Millennium Park 2 at the south corner, people would use it. But I think you'd be better off spending that park money elsewhere, maybe on a rail cap east of One Museum Park or a park built over the Metra Electric yards at 1500S, where you would have a more pleasant mix of sun and shade throughout the day and across the seasons, instead of all shade all the time. The southwest corner seems like a good site for a building.
It's too bad the actual Central Station was torn down in the 70s, it would have been an amazing historic "foothill" to the wall along Roosevelt and an anchor for the development.
|
I think Millennium Park's placement had less to do with abundant sunshine than with the fact that it would be closer to the center of the Loop, rather than being placed on the south end of the Park. If the nexus of Chicago was a few blocks from Michigan and Roosevelt, then you can be sure thats probably where Millennium Park would have gone, despite shadows from skyscrapers.
While sunshine is nice, I don't believe it makes or breaks a great public space.
I fully agree on the loss of Central Station, as well as all the other demolished big Chicago rail terminals, Grand Central and the old Northwestern Station.