HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #801  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2016, 9:33 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
I'm calling a Bomber win.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #802  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2016, 6:35 PM
Cyro's Avatar
Cyro Cyro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,197
I'm hopin for a win as well Esq, Bj...would almost be more satisfying than the sweep over the Riders...almost..lol..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #803  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2016, 6:13 PM
VANRIDERFAN's Avatar
VANRIDERFAN VANRIDERFAN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 5,169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyro View Post
I'm hopin for a win as well Esq, Bj...would almost be more satisfying than the sweep over the Riders...almost..lol..
Goes to show you cannot leave time on the clock.
Riders made sure there was no chance last night against the Tiger-Cats
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #804  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2016, 6:38 PM
drew's Avatar
drew drew is offline
the first stamp is free
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hippyville, Winnipeg
Posts: 8,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by VANRIDERFAN View Post
Goes to show you cannot leave time on the clock.
Riders made sure there was no chance last night against the Tiger-Cats
Well sure, but controlling the clock for a field goal is a bit different than needing to drive down the field for a touchdown.

Pretty much a apples to oranges comparison.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #805  
Old Posted Sep 25, 2016, 6:51 PM
VANRIDERFAN's Avatar
VANRIDERFAN VANRIDERFAN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 5,169
Quote:
Originally Posted by drew View Post
Well sure, but controlling the clock for a field goal is a bit different than needing to drive down the field for a touchdown.

Pretty much a apples to oranges comparison.
I admit I didn't see the end of the Bomber - Stamps game so I cannot comment on the dynamics of the Bomber drive to take the lead late.

Your point is taken. But the Riders did a 3rd down gamble (it was only an inch) when they were already in field goal range to ensure they could run out the clock
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #806  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2016, 2:20 PM
Ando Ando is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,723
Are we taking lessons from the Riders now?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #807  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2016, 3:18 PM
wacko wacko is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 419
Why not? We certainly took some lessons from Winnipeg on how to build a stadium!

Last edited by wacko; Sep 26, 2016 at 3:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #808  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2016, 3:24 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
After sleeping on that game a bit I think it's pretty clear that the Stamps are operating on a whole other level. They basically pushed the Bombers around for the entire first half... to an almost absurd extent really. Their receivers were wide open, little defensive pressure, and by contrast our guys were just smothered. Stamps went to sleep for what they likely thought was garbage time (i.e. the entire second half), let things slip away a bit too far, and with 15 seconds got down to business and did what they had to do.

In some ways the score flattered the Bombers... they fought hard at the end, but that effort was really a buck short and a day late.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #809  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2016, 3:25 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by wacko View Post
Why not? We certainly took some lessons from Winnipeg on how to build a stadium!
That much is obvious from looking at it... capacity, canopy, seating configuration... we are flattered by your monument to Winnipeg

Also, you guys need to give up on Durant. It's obvious he ain't what he used to be... it would be a mistake to let him be anything more than a short-term placeholder. Riders should have a new starter next season, although I suppose from a Bomber fan perspective I'd be happy to see DD come back as the number one next year!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #810  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2016, 4:03 PM
wacko wacko is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 419
Whoops, didn't realize I was posting in the Bombers thread! I moved my Rider game comments over to the proper thread. Sorry about that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #811  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2016, 5:33 PM
VANRIDERFAN's Avatar
VANRIDERFAN VANRIDERFAN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 5,169
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
That much is obvious from looking at it... capacity, canopy, seating configuration... we are flattered by your monument to Winnipeg

Also, you guys need to give up on Durant. It's obvious he ain't what he used to be... it would be a mistake to let him be anything more than a short-term placeholder. Riders should have a new starter next season, although I suppose from a Bomber fan perspective I'd be happy to see DD come back as the number one next year!
A lot of people (mostly fans and commentators from outside of Saskatchewan) are giving up on Durant. I think their analysis is a little premature and I'll trust the true football people and not some of the pretenders who comment on players abilities.

Negativity always makes DD better.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #812  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2016, 5:54 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
^ Talent and ability are not issues. Durability is, especially at this stage in his career.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #813  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2016, 6:15 PM
VANRIDERFAN's Avatar
VANRIDERFAN VANRIDERFAN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 5,169
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
^ Talent and ability are not issues. Durability is, especially at this stage in his career.
He whacked his head on the turf and concussion protocols came into effect. I've been on that turf at old Mosaic. Its as hard as concrete and I'm shocked we haven't had more issues. The new stadium turf (I've been on it as well) is far more forgiving and we should see less impact injuries next year.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #814  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2016, 6:26 PM
Ando Ando is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,723
Actually, its Dur-an-ability.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #815  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2016, 7:03 PM
CoryB CoryB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 5,892
I am somewhat concerned on the Bomber QB prospects for next season. Currently the team has five QBs in camp and not a one under contract for next year.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #816  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2016, 7:09 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
^ It's not that bad. I'm not worried about Glenn at all, he'll resign here if an offer is put in front of him. Nichols is the real issue... I didn't realize his contract expires after this year. As for the rest, meh.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #817  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2016, 8:59 PM
CoryB CoryB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 5,892
^^ I am much more worried about losing Davis and Bennett than Glenn. Reality is Glenn is going to retire sometime soon. David and Bennett could be future starters for the team. Nichols is the really big worry right now with at least two other teams looking. With McLeod just joining the team recently not much is known about him but at #5 on the depth chart not sure it is that important.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #818  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2016, 11:30 PM
buzzg buzzg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,799
If the season continues to go as it is now, I'm confident Nichols will want to stay here, and the Bombers will offer him what it takes to keep him. He likes it here, and with Willy's massive contract now gone, we can afford to pay Nichols what he deserves... and he's putting actual numbers up, which helps justify a big contract.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #819  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2016, 4:02 PM
Treesplease Treesplease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 990
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
After sleeping on that game a bit I think it's pretty clear that the Stamps are operating on a whole other level. They basically pushed the Bombers around for the entire first half... to an almost absurd extent really. Their receivers were wide open, little defensive pressure, and by contrast our guys were just smothered. Stamps went to sleep for what they likely thought was garbage time (i.e. the entire second half), let things slip away a bit too far, and with 15 seconds got down to business and did what they had to do.

In some ways the score flattered the Bombers... they fought hard at the end, but that effort was really a buck short and a day late.
The Bombers are a lot better than I thought they were. I thought they were a turnover (i.e. luck) dependant team; they aren't. I thought the Bombers were toast after they went down 24pts in the first haf - they came back strong. The Stamps are a good team but they are very beatable. I think the biggest thing that hurt the bombers was special teams. Finch was putting the Stamps close to field goal position to start almost every drive. If Finch was held in check then the game would have been different. If the Riders can curb and contain Brandon Banks then the Bombers can contain Roy Finch. Bombers have the punter for it they just need to get ST working better.

Losing to the Stamps in the regular season is no big deal. If the stamps and bombers meet in post season I like the Bombers chances better. You usually don't have to beat the Stamps in the post season as the arrogant asshats typically beat themselves.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #820  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2016, 4:12 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Treesplease View Post
Losing to the Stamps in the regular season is no big deal. If the stamps and bombers meet in post season I like the Bombers chances better. You usually don't have to beat the Stamps in the post season as the arrogant asshats typically beat themselves.
Good point, considering how dominant the Stamps have generally been over the last 25ish years, they have a crap record when it comes to actually sealing the deal. What good is going 16-1-1 when you choke in the playoffs?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:42 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.