Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila
Why would Corridor Capital bother to improve service on the line if funding is in question after October? They need at least another year to make needed improvements.
The Hoosier State is really just royally screwed in Chicagoland. North of Dyer, it uses six(!) different railroads to get to Union Station. Various reroutes have been discussed, mostly using CN's tracks in the Metra Electric corridor, but so far CN has refused to allow this. That may change if the state ever gets off its ass and funds the Grand Crossing connection or a direct connection on the St Charles Air Line (the refusal of officials to even consider building this incredibly useful connection boggles the mind).
|
To your point about re-routing the Hoosier State, it appears as if Corridor Capital has/had a plan to do just that.
The Indiana Passenger Rail Alliance publishes a monthly newsletter named
All Aboard Indiana. In the August issue,
which is available here, an article details a July 17 town meeting in Crawfordsville, IN attended by Fritz Plous, Director of Communications for Corridor Capital, in which he sketches out some of the firm's plans for the Hoosier State.
Of interest, is the following-
Quote:
Corridor Capital plans to eliminate delays by changing routing between Dyer and Chicago. The change requires two new power switches – not manual ones – at a combined cost of $225,000. The switches are needed in Harvey, Illinois, which would allow the Hoosier State to use Canadian National tracks (the old Illinois Central tracks), thus avoiding long delays that passengers presently can endure, Plous stated.
|
That would bring the number of railroads' tracks used down to three - Amtrak trackage out of Union Station, CN trackage on the St. Charles Air Line to the Illinois Central to the Grand Trunk Western, and CSX trackage on the Monon route to Indy, correct?
A few other points about Corridor Capital's plans, as per the article-
-They intend(ed) to make the Hoosier State a seven-day-a-week service.
-They eventually planned to add a second train, after establishing service every day.
-Wi-Fi and ADA washrooms would be available on board right away, with business class service and food service to follow later.
-They plan(or planned) on using what was described as "two or three shining new, single-level cars". Which would mean they won't lease the Horizons that Amtrak currently uses for the route, and that either they have none of their reconditioned Sante Fe Hi-Level cars ready, or have no plans on using them at any point for the route. Maybe they feel they still have a chance with Michigan.
Whether to file this plan under "Goals For The Future" or "What Could Have Been" is anyone's guess at this point.