HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #521  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2014, 12:52 AM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 19,380
Northern Metro Updates




Layton transit oriented development opens to much fanfare

By ANTONE CLARK - Standard-Examiner correspondent

http://www.standard.net/Business/201...h-fanfare.html


Kay's Crossing in Layton officially opened on Friday, July 11, 2014 with a ribbon cutting and tours....

LAYTON – A first-of-its-kind transit oriented development adjacent to a FrontRunner station was unveiled Friday in an atmosphere that featured trains, planes and rain.

Officials cut the ribbon on the Kay’s Crossing mixed-use development, touting the possibilities the four-story facility will bring to people who choose to use FrontRunner.

The development includes 156 apartments, all one and two bedroom, along with 2,000 square feet of retail space. The project is the first private, multi-family development facilitated by the Utah Transit Authority. It is located adjacent to a UTA FrontRunner station and is a forerunner to potential developments at FrontRunner stations in Clearfield and Pleasant View...



.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #522  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2014, 11:48 AM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 19,380
Southern Metro Updates

Quote:
Originally Posted by s.p.hansen View Post

Provo council votes unanimously on BRT


http://www.heraldextra.com/news/loca...880b5f5fa.html

"Construction should start this time next year and will be done in winter of 2016"
http://www.heraldextra.com/news/loca...ce00fe2a5.html


There doesn't seem to be a definitive map yet of the entire finalized line in regards to what segments will have fully dedicated bus lanes. If everything is the same on this map but route 4, then just change the area around BYU to non dedicated lanes and the stops and it should be accurate.



http://www.brt4provo.com/2014/02/26/...ise-for-provo/


.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #523  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2014, 1:35 PM
Wizened Variations's Avatar
Wizened Variations Wizened Variations is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,611
Reference

Quote:
Originally Posted by delts145 View Post
[B]Southern Metro Updates


In order to make this work, IMO, the Front Runner has to have a high enough frequency to essentially connect the beginning and (approximate) end of the BRT route, and the net time of the Frontrunner running over this segment as short as possible. In addition, run times of the Front Runner need to mesh very well with BRT times, with no more than a 10 minute wait between arrival and departure times for both transit modes.

Single transfer loops can work very well to increase usage.
__________________
Good read on relationship between increasing number of freeway lanes and traffic

http://www.vtpi.org/gentraf.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #524  
Old Posted Jul 25, 2014, 2:41 PM
electricron's Avatar
electricron electricron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Granbury, Texas
Posts: 3,523
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wizened Variations View Post
In order to make this work, IMO, the Front Runner has to have a high enough frequency to essentially connect the beginning and (approximate) end of the BRT route, and the net time of the Frontrunner running over this segment as short as possible. In addition, run times of the Front Runner need to mesh very well with BRT times, with no more than a 10 minute wait between arrival and departure times for both transit modes.

Single transfer loops can work very well to increase usage.
BRT lines are built for local traffic within the Provo city limits. It shouldn't need any connection at all with Frontrunner trains to be valuable. The fact that it will should be considered as a positive experience, no matter how frequent Frontrunner trains run.
I don't think anyone expects Amtrak to service NYC's Penn Station with as many trains as local subway trains - why do you expect UTA to be any different?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #525  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2014, 10:40 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 19,380
Downtown Update


Photo courtesy of SLC Bike Share



An expanded bike-share program and more bike lanes coming to Salt Lake

Isaac Riddle | July 23, 2014 | Salt Lake City, Sustainability

Read More: http://www.theslcblog.org/?p=556

Bicycle usage is continuing to grow in Salt Lake. The folks at GREENbike Share Program, along with the Downtown Alliance, announced on Tuesday the expansion of the popular bike-share program to other areas of the city.

The 16 month-old bike-sharing program has expanded from its original 10 stations with 55 active bikes to 20 stations with 160 active bikes. The expansion includes eight new stations that opened this month with another six of the most popular stations being expanded to accommodate increased demand.

“Bike-share expansion means there’s even more non-motorized travel options for citizens, which not only helps better our air quality, but I believe helps build a healthier, more connected, and socially-invested community,” said Stan Penfold, Chair of the SLC Redevelopment Agency in Tuesday’s press release. “We’re thrilled about the program’s success, and hope to see more stations and GREENbikes in the years to come.”...



Salt Lake City bike-sharing station in front of the Tour of Utah office building at 200E 400S. Photo by Flickr user Paul Kimo McGregor

... Construction will start this summer on street improvements for downtown sections of 200 West and 300 South. Protected bike lanes will be installed along 200 West from North Temple to 900 South and along 300 South from Pioneer Park at 300 West to 600 East.

The bike lanes will be separated from auto traffic by moving curbside parking toward the center of the street and installing a physical barrier between the curbside bike lane and parking and auto traffic. Traffic speeds will be reduced as well to make biking safer along these two corridors.

The 200 West protected bike lane will connect to the 9 Line Trail that includes a buffered bike lane from 200 West to 700 West and a bike trail built along an abandoned rail corridor from 700 West to Redwood Road at 900 South.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gusam26 View Post
Pic By Gusam26 - Bike station installation @ exchange place


Key Bank station near Temple Sqaure. Photo courtesy of SLC Bike Share.

Each bike can be taken for 30 minutes, and once you return a bike, you
can take another for 30 minutes. There’s no limit on bikes per day. If a bike
is out longer than 30 minutes, the rider is charged a small fee. No
two stations are more than 15 to 20 minutes apart.


.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #526  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2014, 7:11 AM
Wizened Variations's Avatar
Wizened Variations Wizened Variations is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by electricron View Post
BRT lines are built for local traffic within the Provo city limits. It shouldn't need any connection at all with Frontrunner trains to be valuable. The fact that it will should be considered as a positive experience, no matter how frequent Frontrunner trains run.
I don't think anyone expects Amtrak to service NYC's Penn Station with as many trains as local subway trains - why do you expect UTA to be any different?
Yes I do expect UTA to be different. Hopefully, those that are building new transit systems can learn from the mistakes of the old.* What SLC is doing rather well is integrating the pieces of their Wasatch Front system into a well designed network on more than a single hub, spoke set up.

*Most of the time, this does not occur, as each generation reinvents the wheel and calls it something different, particularly in knowledge areas where much of what is known, has been known for generations.
__________________
Good read on relationship between increasing number of freeway lanes and traffic

http://www.vtpi.org/gentraf.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #527  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2014, 1:43 PM
electricron's Avatar
electricron electricron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Granbury, Texas
Posts: 3,523
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wizened Variations View Post
Yes I do expect UTA to be different. Hopefully, those that are building new transit systems can learn from the mistakes of the old.*
??????????
A well run BRT bus might be carrying 60 passengers. That's less than one half of a car on a Frontrunner train, which normally runs with at least three cars. If everyone on the train at its last stop, Provo, decides to ride the bus to their final destination, it'll take at least six buses. I dare to suggest that if as many Frontrunner trains arrived at the station as buses, there would be passengers waiting at the Provo station for a very long time. Likewise, there would be very empty Frontrunner trains leaving Provo.
You forgot to account for the capacity of the various transit vehicles. I'll agree timing is important for transferring passengers. But it is wrong to expect a train waiting at the station for every bus arriving or departing from the station. It'll be wrong to have a bus every hour just because the train runs every hour, as it is to expect a train every five minutes because a bus arrives at the station every five minutes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #528  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2014, 3:41 PM
Wizened Variations's Avatar
Wizened Variations Wizened Variations is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by electricron View Post
??????????
A well run BRT bus might be carrying 60 passengers. That's less than one half of a car on a Frontrunner train, which normally runs with at least three cars. If everyone on the train at its last stop, Provo, decides to ride the bus to their final destination, it'll take at least six buses. I dare to suggest that if as many Frontrunner trains arrived at the station as buses, there would be passengers waiting at the Provo station for a very long time. Likewise, there would be very empty Frontrunner trains leaving Provo.
You forgot to account for the capacity of the various transit vehicles. I'll agree timing is important for transferring passengers. But it is wrong to expect a train waiting at the station for every bus arriving or departing from the station. It'll be wrong to have a bus every hour just because the train runs every hour, as it is to expect a train every five minutes because a bus arrives at the station every five minutes.
There are very well known realities in transit design. These are destinations served, frequency of service, length of travel time, multi-modal transfers, shortness of time at transfer points, ease of transfer, mechanical reliability, safety, and cleanliness.

The specific question about scheduling involves minimum wait time. The basic way to do this, IMO, is to have as high as possible frequencies on each transit mode, and, to stagger the arrival and departure times to adjust to difference in frequencies between modes.

For example: mode X arrives and departs every 30 minutes, and mode Y arrives and departs every 10 minutes.

Then the keys are to adjust mode X such that 2 out of 3 arrivals are 5 to 10 minutes prior to the arrival of mode Y (going away from the center of greatest population on the "main line"). Similarly, 2 out of 3 arrivals of mode X going towards the population center need to arrive 5 to 10 minutes after the arrival of mode Y.

This would create a 2 transfer point loop, with the compromise occurring between adjusting such times at each end of the BRT loop. The key here being the commuter line.

EDIT: The Frontrunner has stops north and south of the loop. Two BRT buses theoretically could provide 120 riders on same the northbound Frontrunner train. With trains running at 30 minute intervals and the BRT at 10 minute intervals (and yes, 1 bus load at each transfer point has to wait 20 minutes due to different time schedules), the total load capacity from the BRT to the Frontrunner at the two transfer points is 6x 60 people per direction, or 720 people per hour for both directions.
__________________
Good read on relationship between increasing number of freeway lanes and traffic

http://www.vtpi.org/gentraf.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #529  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2014, 9:41 PM
Hatman's Avatar
Hatman Hatman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 1,430
Capacity would be an issue if everyone who rode the FrontRunner decided to get on a bus. Usually that won't be the case*.

The BRT is a good project on its own - connecting two large universities with two large malls and all of downtown Provo - but it would not be getting such priority from UTA if it were not for the connections to FrontRunner. This project, I have been told, is designed to be 1 part intra-city transportation and 1 part FrontRunner connector.
Meaning, you're both right.

*The unusual part is for sporting events. I happened to take FrontRunner to a BYU game last year, and UTA had FIFTEEN (I kid you not!!!) buses lined up beside the train station in Provo, ready to 'load and go' with all the sports fans. I have no idea how the BRT system will work on sports days, with the capacity issues and especially with the extensive shared lanes around BYU campus, but UTA has said they already have "plans."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #530  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2014, 11:59 AM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 19,380
Salt Lake City Metro


Per capita transit ridership in Interior West cities


http://www.rideuta.com UtahTransitAuthority Named No. American Transit System Of The Year


Quote:
Originally Posted by Cirrus View Post

FiveThirtyEight.com (ie the best general-audience statisticians on the internet) has a great post up today about transit ridership in US cities. Click the link for the full (and very informative) post, but for your convenience here's the per capita transit ridership data pulled out for interior west urbanized areas. Note that urbanized areas are agglomerations that include multiple cities, meaning for example that Boulder is clustered as part of Denver.

Interesting that Denver & SLC are exactly neck and neck. Skip all the way down to 22 nationwide, and then you hit them both. Also, ouch, Boise.


Code:
US 	IW	URBAN		TRIPS
RANK	RANK	AREA		PER CAPITA

22	1	Salt Lake City	42.2
23	2	Denver		41.1
50	3	Flagstaff, AZ	26.6
57	4	Tucson, AZ	24.2
66	5	Logan, UT	20.8
68	6 	Phoenix		20.0
73	7 	Albuquerque	19.0
97	8 	Missoula, MT	15.6
118	9	Santa Fe, NM	12.8
153	10	Ft Collins, CO 	 9.8
179	11	Gr Junction, CO	 7.7
184	12	Pueblo, CO	 7.5
193	13	Great Falls, MT	 7.3
232	14	CO Springs, CO	 5.2
248	15	Greeley, CO	 4.3
251	16	Boise		 4.1

...

Last edited by delts145; Nov 14, 2014 at 11:19 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #531  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2014, 11:18 AM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 19,380
Downtown/Airport Updates

Quote:
Originally Posted by SLC Projects View Post
Have any of you been out to the airport lately? There has been a ton of earth/dirt moving with tons of backhoes
( at least 10 or so ) digging the area up. This is the field south of the long term parking as you first enter the airport. This redevelopment is in full
swing.



Quote:
Originally Posted by BoiseAirport View Post
Delta will fly Salt Lake City to Amsterdam, beginning May 1st, 2015. The flight
will be operated with the Boeing 767-300ER.


http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/delta...s-may-1-a.html

Quote:
Originally Posted by wrendog View Post
Salt Lake City - Mexico City flight on Delta to start in December.

Last edited by delts145; Nov 14, 2014 at 11:23 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #532  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2014, 5:22 AM
N830MH N830MH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,983
Any news at SLC airports yet? Is that construction still going on?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #533  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2014, 11:10 AM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 19,380
The Airport is a massive multi-billion dollar project, and will be in full swing for several years. At the moment there's a lot of ancillary prep and construction going on. You can follow regular updates at the local forum... http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/show...198980&page=12



https://lh4.googleusercontent.com

Last edited by delts145; Nov 14, 2014 at 8:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #534  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2014, 11:11 AM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 19,380
Downtown - On The North Temple/International Airport Line


http://www.rideuta.com UtahTransitAuthority Named No. American Transit System Of The Year


In Pictures: Developments near North Temple nearly finished

Isaac Riddle  October 30, 2014  Depot District, Developments, Salt Lake City, Under Construction - http://www.slcity.org/in-pictures-de...arly-finished/

Photos and Text By Isaac Riddle @ THE SLC BLOG http://www.theslcblog.org/author/iriddle81gmail-com/


While developments are now emerging west of Interstate 15, most recent development along North Temple has been focused around the 600 West intersection. The North Temple/600 West corner is adjacent to a TRAX station and FrontRunner commuter rail station, making it one of the most transit orientated sections of the city.

Two large infill projects near the intersection appear to be in the final stages of construction. The projects are the next phase of the Bridges and Citifront, which consists of two residential buildings consisting of just under 100 units, and the five-story, 115-unit mixed-use project called North Sixth. The projects will add a combined 206 residential units to what is fast becoming one of the most densely populated corners of Salt Lake.


Bridges at Citifront:

North Sixth Apartments and the final phase of Bridges at Citifront as seen from the North Temple viaduct. Photo by Isaac Riddle.



The new units at the Bridges at Citifront as seen from the corner of 600 West and North Temple. Photo by Isaac Riddle.


The new units at the Bridges at Citifront as seen from the corner of 600 West and North Temple. Photo by Isaac Riddle.


The new units at the Bridges at Citifront as seen from 600 West near South Temple. Photo by Isaac Riddle.


The new units at the Bridges at Citifront as seen from 600 West near South Temple. Photo by Isaac Riddle.


The new units at the Bridges at Citifront as seen from 600 West. Photo by Isaac Riddle.


The new units at the Bridges at Citifront as seen from 600 West. Photo by Isaac Riddle.


.

Last edited by delts145; Apr 12, 2015 at 11:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #535  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2015, 6:35 PM
Hatman's Avatar
Hatman Hatman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 1,430
Okay, so I had a little extra time on my hands... perhaps a lot of extra time... and I was wondering just how FrontRunner frequency matched up with other transit agencies. So I searched through the listed time tables of various transit agencies and counted how many departures they had from their main cities... for example, Seattle's Sounder trains all depart from King Street Station, just like all our FrontRunner trains leave from Salt Lake Central Station. Some cities are large enough that there are multiple main stations, such as New York City (Penn Station and Grand Central Terminal), Chicago (Union Station, LaSalle Street Station, and Millennium Park Station), and Boston (North and South Stations). I included departures from all of these stations. I also included Amtrak departures, as many transit agencies include Amtrak trains on their schedules as well (Salt Lake City has two Amtrak departures per day, so we benefited too).

Then I took the total train departures from each city and divided it by the population of each city. The results surprised me:



Clearly Salt Lake City is benefiting from its lower population (lack of incorporating suburbs into the city), but that can't explain all of it. The largest thing to take away from this chart is that FrontRunner is AWESOME. I mean, REALLY AWESOME. Take a look at other cities that started running their commuter trains at the same time as SLC, such as Minneapolis, Albuquerque, and Seattle - and look at how many departures per day they have. The reason they are different is that they decided to use existing tracks owned by the freight railroads, which meant smaller up-front (capital) costs, but much higher operating costs. FrontRuner has its own tracks, which cost $$$, but operating trains over tracks you already own is relatively cheap. Also, it means you get to schedule your own trains, so they can leave as often as you like. I know of no other transit agency that has done this (since WWII), which is why SLC is 3rd on the list of daily train departures per capita (And 2nd if all Amtrak trains are removed from counting).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #536  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2015, 7:23 PM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is offline
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 9,064
We can't see the chart. Your dropbox account isn't configured to allow external access. Perhaps try imgur?
__________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Shaw
Don't ask people not to debate a topic. Just stop making debatable assertions. Problem solved.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #537  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2015, 8:13 PM
ssiguy ssiguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: White Rock BC
Posts: 10,725
SLC made an excellent choice by owning it's own commuter rail tracks. they can set their own timetables and as the ridership grows the system can become more of a suburban rail type system for all day mass transit as opposed to just rush hour service.

This is what Toronto's Metrolinx has done. they were freight lines but they have been buying the track and now own over 80% of the track of the 450km system. Frequency is increasing as is all day service to turn the system into a U-Bahn type service.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #538  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2015, 8:34 PM
Hatman's Avatar
Hatman Hatman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 1,430
I apologize if DropBox isn't working for you. It usually works just fine. Either way, Here's imgur's attempt:


And UTA's FrontRunner schedule: (Link)

Last edited by Hatman; Jan 21, 2015 at 9:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #539  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2015, 9:21 PM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is offline
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 9,064
55 departures per day really is awesome! It sounds like the lines must run at least half hourly throughout the entire day.
__________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Shaw
Don't ask people not to debate a topic. Just stop making debatable assertions. Problem solved.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #540  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2015, 10:27 PM
Makid Makid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,004
The current line runs mostly on a 30 minute schedule. There are a few hours during the day that it is operating hourly.

There are currently plans in the works to expand frequency to 15 minutes all day. This may require a bit more double tracking along the line from the current amount but the studies have shown that 15 minute frequency would nearly double ridership along Frontrunner.

UTA does own the tracks and the ROW to have it fully double tracked the length of the line. It is also in the long range plans for the line to be double tracked completely and I think it is still planned to be electrified rather than diesel powered. Of course this is long term (25 to 30 years out).
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:10 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.