HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7181  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2020, 5:26 PM
MBAus MBAus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 35
Any idea what the surprise announcement ABIA is hinting at in this tweet. Someone said on the one the other day that Morse code was JETSTREAM JETSTREAM JETSTREAM.

https://twitter.com/AUStinAirport/st...065856005?s=20
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7182  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2020, 6:49 PM
the Genral's Avatar
the Genral the Genral is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Between RRock and a hard place
Posts: 4,432
Sounded like someone with a stutter was sending an SOS. That would make sense. The only Jetstream I know of is a smallish turbo prop.
But that wouldn't an exciting announcement. I hate being toyed with...just say it!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7183  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2020, 7:59 PM
sammyk sammyk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 514
Blue Angels related?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7184  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2020, 8:35 PM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin <------------> Birmingham?
Posts: 57,327
Yeah, I read about the Blue Angels planning a flyover of Austin. They and the Thunderbirds are doing a nationwide "tour".

https://cbsaustin.com/news/local/blu...ding-to-report
__________________
Conform or be cast out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7185  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2020, 11:19 PM
GoldenBoot's Avatar
GoldenBoot GoldenBoot is offline
Member since 2001
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Terra Firma
Posts: 3,261
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinFromTexas View Post
Yeah, I read about the Blue Angels planning a flyover of Austin. They and the Thunderbirds are doing a nationwide "tour".

https://cbsaustin.com/news/local/blu...ding-to-report
I think I heard the flyover is going to happen Monday, May 4th.
__________________
AUSTIN (City): 974,447 +1.30% - '20-'22 | AUSTIN MSA (5 counties): 2,473,275 +8.32% - '20-'23
SAN ANTONIO (City): 1,472,909 +2.69% - '20-'22 | SAN ANTONIO MSA (8 counties): 2,703,999 +5.70% - '20-'23
AUS-SAT REGION (MSAs/13 counties): 5,177,274 +6.94% - '20-'23 | *SRC: US Census*
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7186  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2020, 2:34 PM
jbssfelix's Avatar
jbssfelix jbssfelix is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Central Park
Posts: 384
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenBoot View Post
I think I heard the flyover is going to happen Monday, May 4th.
Thunderbirds recently did a flyover of most of the major hospitals on along the Front Range here in Colorado.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7187  
Old Posted May 8, 2020, 4:49 AM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Where the lights are much brighter
Posts: 12,052
WTF? A pedestrian vs SW Airlines 737 fatal accident on the runway:

https://www.kxan.com/news/local/aust...rted-deceased/
__________________
Follow The ATX on X:
https://twitter.com/TheATX1

Things will be great when you're downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7188  
Old Posted May 8, 2020, 2:51 PM
freerover freerover is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,274
2nd straight airport commission that's canceled. Not sure why they can't do it via Skype.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7189  
Old Posted May 8, 2020, 8:16 PM
freerover freerover is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,274
Quote:
Originally Posted by The ATX View Post
WTF? A pedestrian vs SW Airlines 737 fatal accident on the runway:

https://www.kxan.com/news/local/aust...rted-deceased/
From Surly:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7190  
Old Posted May 8, 2020, 8:33 PM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Where the lights are much brighter
Posts: 12,052
Ouch.
__________________
Follow The ATX on X:
https://twitter.com/TheATX1

Things will be great when you're downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7191  
Old Posted May 12, 2020, 9:40 PM
Mikey711MN's Avatar
Mikey711MN Mikey711MN is offline
I am so smart, S-M-R-T!
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Moved south to Austin, TX
Posts: 646
Quote:
Originally Posted by freerover View Post
2nd straight airport commission that's canceled. Not sure why they can't do it via Skype.
They can and they are. It's listed as the Special Meeting on 5/13 with several updates on the Agenda. FYI.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7192  
Old Posted May 14, 2020, 1:09 PM
aschwab aschwab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 112
When things do open back up, how do people think our route map will change? International connections?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7193  
Old Posted May 14, 2020, 3:05 PM
freerover freerover is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,274
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikey711MN View Post
They can and they are. It's listed as the Special Meeting on 5/13 with several updates on the Agenda. FYI.
Thanks!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7194  
Old Posted May 14, 2020, 6:05 PM
StoOgE StoOgE is offline
Resident Moron
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by aschwab View Post
When things do open back up, how do people think our route map will change? International connections?
Got a dart board?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7195  
Old Posted May 15, 2020, 5:03 PM
Mikey711MN's Avatar
Mikey711MN Mikey711MN is offline
I am so smart, S-M-R-T!
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Moved south to Austin, TX
Posts: 646
Quote:
Originally Posted by aschwab View Post
When things do open back up, how do people think our route map will change? International connections?
First and foremost, I anticipate the removal of focus city or P2P routes on legacy airlines, e.g. DL to RDU, AA to SEA, etc. for them to reset to their more traditional hub-and-spoke networks.

Most international service will take years to reappear at the port, if ever. I certainly don't envision BA, LH, and KL to coexist as otherwise scheduled this year, but I would hope that we'd see one of them with 4x-5x weekly service at some point in the next 12 months. Toronto may stay on the board, but other Canadian service is certainly unlikely for several years I would think. Someone will likely reenter the CUN route, but that's probably it for Mexico in the near-term.

The real unknown is the ULCC market, notably the level of service that Allegiant, Spirit, and Frontier can provide. On the one hand, they can stimulate some traffic, but I sense some psychological apprehension by the general public for tightly packed airplanes - either perceived or real - that may be damaging to their products in particular, e.g. <30" pitch.

Taken together, my sense is that we may see some P2P routes dropped by DL, AA, and even WN that could be picked up and economically operated by the ULCCs. Anything previously offered to marginal cities such as Des Moines are all certainly never coming back.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7196  
Old Posted May 15, 2020, 6:16 PM
shoreditch shoreditch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 82
I highly doubt any passenger concerned about catching something makes a distinction between the seat pitch on a ULCC like spirit v/s sitting in economy on Delta. The risk profile is exactly the same.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7197  
Old Posted May 18, 2020, 9:01 PM
GoldenBoot's Avatar
GoldenBoot GoldenBoot is offline
Member since 2001
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Terra Firma
Posts: 3,261
Quote:
Originally Posted by aschwab View Post
When things do open back up, how do people think our route map will change? International connections?
It will most definitely see some changes...

There are a myriad of (fluid) variables in trying to figure out what post COVID-19 air travel will look like. Nobody knows for sure. So, we look back at past crises to help us create hypotheses as to what the outcome may be. The following are bullet points from a long white paper composed by ASM Global Route Development - released a few weeks ago – which may shed more light on where we are and what needs to be done.



General Observations & Hypotheses based on Past Crises:
-Expect major and ULCC airline bankruptcies and or ceasing of operations.

-Financial losses incurred during the crisis may drive significant airline consolidation.

-Previous crises drove some airlines out of the market, and others to consolidate and to rationalize their focus city/hubs and networks. It is likely there will be more casualties this time. While governments are offering financial aid, there won’t be enough money to save everyone. Preference will likely be given to large airlines with broad networks.

-Because the crisis will leave airlines in a much weaker financial position, they will be forced to re-assess their entire business and look for ways to operate more cost-effectively.

-Airlines may again work to diversify their revenue sources, with a stronger focus on ancillary revenues and alternate revenue sources such as credit card deals.

-An industry-wide focus on cost reduction will place. Aircraft seat density may increase, onboard products may either be removed or go from free to pay-per-use, distribution costs may be reduced by shifting sales to their own websites, and airlines may increase the pressure on airports to reduce their fees and charges.

-Corporate stability and internal budget restrictions within companies will play a key tactical role. While overall corporate health will vary significantly across industries, countries, and regions, discretionary travel budgets in general will be impacted. Furthermore, business behavioral modification during the recent stay-at-home period – “hey, this video call thing works pretty well” – may further incentivize corporate travel decision makers to focus on non-essential travel as an expense reduction target.

-From a personal travel perspective, discretionary spending reductions from the evolving world economic downturn will impact millions of individual travel decisions.

-Airlines around the world are constructed upon an economic model dependent on nearly full airplanes and in, most cases, relatively limited seat pitch. In the United States, domestic load factor has hovered between 84-85% over a period of several years (a figure which includes only paying passengers). When will customers again be comfortable in the middle of a row of five? It will happen at some point. But in the interim, concepts such as blocking off seats may have a destabilizing effect on the economics of an industry which will likely already be struggling to stimulate demand.

-It appears a near certainty that non-stop itineraries worldwide will be reduced through the upcoming recovery period.



Airline Fleet Plans and Development Strategies:
-Airlines’ fleets are likely to change as we enter the COVID-19 recovery phase. We saw after past crises that airlines got leaner and more efficient, retiring older aircraft whose operating costs were too high or that were too large for their markets. Given the severe impact that COVID-19 is having on the marketplace, we can expect to see airlines adjust their fleet compositions in response.

-Airlines will be under increasing pressure to streamline capacity and improve cost efficiency.

-Airline failures will take capacity out of the market; in many cases airlines will view this as a market correction and leave the capacity unreplaced.

-Aircraft downgauges and cancellation of marginal performing flights are likely. With airlines in survival mode, they will likely play airports off against each other.

-Airlines will be focused on increasing network efficiency. Previous crises resulted in mergers and focus city/hub closures, so it’s unrealistic to think that this time airlines will put everything back the way it was before. Every route and destination will likely be scrutinized, with marginal performers being reduced or cancelled. Retirement of older aircraft will likely be expedited, as well as large widebodies such as the A380 because of their high operating cost. Other (long haul) retirement candidates might be the B757, B767, B747, A310 and A340.

-Newer widebodies (B787 & A350), with their smaller seating capacity and improved cost efficiencies may now be viewed by carriers as opportunities to “right-size” capacity rather than for expanding onto new routes.

-Airline’s narrowbody fleets are also undergoing significant changes. The Boeing 737Max aircraft are expected to start flying again as we enter the COVID-19 recovery phase. These aircraft, along with the A320neo family, have the range to fly longer-haul missions such as USA to Europe. The A220 offers the ability to fly small aircraft on longer intra-regional routes, such as Montreal-Seattle on Air Canada which was announced last year and is scheduled to start in May.

-Similar to the new widebodies, these new narrowbody aircraft offer improved range and the ability to serve thinner markets profitably. However, as we move into the post-COVID-19 recovery phase airlines may view these aircraft as candidates to downgauge existing routes to reduce costs.

-This does not mean that new route opportunities will not exist. After previous crises, even as airlines were retiring aircraft, reducing capacity and cutting routes, we saw many new routes being launched. With over 10,000 of these new narrowbodies yet to be delivered, and airlines expected to restructure their networks, new route opportunities will inevitably emerge as some carriers adopt a clear “Anti-Hub” strategy.

-Airlines will be more flexible with network and operational planning, including demand-driven dispatch, schedule optimization tools, more seasonal and day-of-week flexibility, a wider array of distribution options, etc. This should result in more efficient management of capacity vs. demand.

-One theory is that the low-cost airlines may emerge stronger post-COVID-19. In this scenario, we would expect to see a greater increase in point-to-point flying and smaller indirect flows, similar to what’s been experienced on intra-Europe travel over the past several years.



What does this mean for Airports:
-The consensus view is that traffic for many airports will not get back to the levels achieved in 2019 until the end of 2022 or early 2023. One or two in the industry predict an earlier return, others don’t expect to get back to 2019 levels until 2024.

-Route development will be more important than ever – attracting and keeping air routes will be the major priority for airport businesses.

-Given the urgency to reduce costs, expect airlines to significantly increase the pressure on airports. Airport costs will likely be a more important factor than ever before, and airlines will be looking for more creative types of route support and incentives.

-Deep and long-lasting route support will be a necessity – airlines’ need to mitigate risk will demand more of airports and their city/destination stakeholders.

-Airports’ strategy and positioning will need refinement

-Airline engagement will be more important than ever.

-Delivering the market to sustain air routes will be critical.

-While retrenchment into strong proven markets and networks may dominate the early period of recovery, new route development and carriers entering new territories will follow, filling gaps newly vacated, and capitalizing on the new market serving capabilities of fleet.

-Airlines will be looking to reduce costs and improve efficiency, at least in the short to medium term. Aircraft downgauges and cancellation of marginal performing flights are likely. With airlines in survival mode, they will likely play airports off against each other.

-Depending on which airlines emerge strongest, and what fleets they have, there could still be opportunities for new routes amongst the rebuild. Secondary markets with less competition may be attractive targets for airlines, especially where significant airport cost advantages exist.

-There will emerge a new post COVID-19 business case where demonstrating destination and market trust will be more important than traditional route forecasts and market numbers. Cities and places will need to coherently articulate their re-emergence plans to `show their attractiveness and health and wellbeing strength.

-Consumer confidence regarding international travel, destination management hub and congested airports may be low as passenger anxiety and nervousness around COVID-19 will persist for some time to come. Trust in places and the travel journey will be paramount.

-Airports should undertake a major rethink of their operational and facilitation plans to help overcome the low level of consumer confidence. It would require as a minimum, airports to implement safeguarding operational measures to reassure and protect passengers.

-Airports should start looking to radically re design their future facilities and terminals to accommodate future long-term requirements as a result of COVID-19 and other such like potential global crisis.
-Airports should market and communicate these safeguarding measures to potential visitors and consumers alike as well as to their airlines and other B2B partners.

-Airports should use this pause effectively to revisit and refine where appropriate their route development and marketing strategies, including identifying potential new route targets and new opportunities that may present themselves in the new world post recovery. This may for example involve a switch to pursue volume markets with LCC’s as opposed to a strategy that may have been focused on the more traditional hub and spoke.



Basic Conclusions:
-This crisis will force major changes to the norms the industry has established. The requirements for starting air service, whether resuming or new, are now different. A recovery is about the magnitude and pace of traffic restoration. In that regard, the data we have all relied on so heavily will for now just be a depiction of the past with trends that are no longer relevant.

-So many societal elements are being affected by the crisis, ensuring that historical expectations of demand and the travel patterns cannot be counted on any longer.

-Throughout the recovery period, however long that lasts, we believe airlines will continue to demand increased levels of incentives to resume, start and maintain air services. Airlines are aware of the economic driver that their air services are for communities that will be striving to rebuild their connectivity as early as they can. They will undoubtedly seek greater sharing of risks. Airports, for all intents and purposes, are closed during this time; and for cities, communities and destinations whose incomes and finances are being severely tested, the demands of airlines may well fall on deaf ears compared to other economy and society rebuild measures they need to focus on. Those that do not remain competitive in the support arena are likely to be left behind.

-Two themes will need to be established in the minds of the airlines - the strength of the market we had, and the strength of the recovery we are having.
__________________
AUSTIN (City): 974,447 +1.30% - '20-'22 | AUSTIN MSA (5 counties): 2,473,275 +8.32% - '20-'23
SAN ANTONIO (City): 1,472,909 +2.69% - '20-'22 | SAN ANTONIO MSA (8 counties): 2,703,999 +5.70% - '20-'23
AUS-SAT REGION (MSAs/13 counties): 5,177,274 +6.94% - '20-'23 | *SRC: US Census*
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7198  
Old Posted May 19, 2020, 4:39 PM
freerover freerover is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,274
Airport Revenue hit 68.1 million decline for the year.

https://www.austintexas.gov/edims/do....cfm?id=340648
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7199  
Old Posted May 19, 2020, 6:33 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,588
Goldenboot, thanks for the article -- really interesting discussion of what might come next. Several times in there I perked up a bit -- ABIA seems to have a decent chance of not only ultimately surviving, but even thriving in the aftermath of this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7200  
Old Posted May 19, 2020, 7:35 PM
ILUVSAT's Avatar
ILUVSAT ILUVSAT is offline
May the Schwartz be w/ U!
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,734
Quote:
Originally Posted by freerover View Post
Airport Revenue hit 68.1 million decline for the year.

https://www.austintexas.gov/edims/do....cfm?id=340648
That was a "FY2020 Projection." However, the actual will probably be not too far off.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:47 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.