HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


View Poll Results: What is the commieblock capital of Canada?
Laval 10 5.15%
Longueuil 9 4.64%
Gatineau 3 1.55%
Ottawa 32 16.49%
Kingston 2 1.03%
Belleville 2 1.03%
Scarborough 23 11.86%
North York 35 18.04%
Hamilton 34 17.53%
Kitchener-Waterloo 6 3.09%
London 44 22.68%
Windsor 3 1.55%
Edmonton 25 12.89%
Burnaby 1 0.52%
Winnipeg 15 7.73%
Elsewhere: please state your claim & justify! 8 4.12%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 194. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2011, 7:05 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is online now
The Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 44,873
Commie-block (slabsville) capital of Canada

Nominate contenders. According to urban dictionary, a commieblock (aka concrete slab) are

Quote:
Serial hi-rise public housing, usually tall concrete building that has identical buildings around it built in a cluster. Invented by socialist governments to provide fast and cheap housing for its citizens. Most of them are in countries like Russia and China and provide the bulk of public housing. Rare in Western countries, but some of American "projects" are in fact commieblocks. Modern commieblocks are very clean, comfortable and prove to be excellent housing type with many advantages over urban sprawl
That last sentence is up for debate, but I digress.

Gimme your best shots. Nominate your contenders. Size is not everything here; proportion matters more! e.g., London Ontario's highrises are almost all commieblocks. Longueuil is commieblock paradise.

Where is Slabsville, Canada? What is the commieblock capital of the land?

My nomination: London, Ontario. Behold:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wharn View Post
I vote the entire Oxford/Wonderland intersection in London, Ontario.
Looking north on Wonderland Road:


Wonderland and Oxford, looking north by rising_sun_19, on Flickr

And to the south:


Wonderland and Oxford, looking south by rising_sun_19, on Flickr
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/newr...eply&p=5127657
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2011, 7:09 PM
Highinthesky Highinthesky is offline
Beefeater
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: London
Posts: 379
I think some of the neighbourhoods in the north end of Toronto will take this one. Not only are they large concrete monsters but they are run down with many having visiable fire damage.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2011, 7:12 PM
BretttheRiderFan's Avatar
BretttheRiderFan BretttheRiderFan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,667
I'd say pretty much every big city has those

That picture definitely wasn't enough to convince me that London is the capital of commieblocks
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2011, 7:13 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is online now
The Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 44,873
Forgot Winnipeg. There are lots of slabs in Winnipeg.
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2011, 7:17 PM
Highinthesky Highinthesky is offline
Beefeater
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: London
Posts: 379
This stretch of Dixon comes to mind off the top of my head

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2011, 7:18 PM
flar's Avatar
flar flar is online now
..........
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 15,182
I added Winnipeg to the poll and voted for London.

London has commie blocks spread all over the city, I would guess more per capita than any other largish city, and they continue to build them.

Check out the area around Cherryhill Mall for another magnificent cluster.




Ottawa has a lot, too. Hamilton has a bunch downtown, but relatively few in otherparts of the city (probably fewer overall than London).
__________________
RECENT PHOTOS:
TORONTOSAN FRANCISCO ROCHESTER, NYHAMILTONGODERICH, ON WHEATLEY, ONCOBOURG, ONLAS VEGASLOS ANGELES
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2011, 7:19 PM
BretttheRiderFan's Avatar
BretttheRiderFan BretttheRiderFan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,667


Mid-rises but they get my vote
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2011, 7:27 PM
flar's Avatar
flar flar is online now
..........
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 15,182
__________________
RECENT PHOTOS:
TORONTOSAN FRANCISCO ROCHESTER, NYHAMILTONGODERICH, ON WHEATLEY, ONCOBOURG, ONLAS VEGASLOS ANGELES
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2011, 7:29 PM
Highinthesky Highinthesky is offline
Beefeater
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: London
Posts: 379
Beautiful Regent Park, location location location couldn't save that neighbourhood

Regent Park's residential dwellings are entirely social housing

Should add some Regent Park news clippings, someone might pick up on a theme
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2011, 7:39 PM
Cambridgite
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I voted North York. It's hard to beat that place in sheer number and density of commieblocks. Scarborough is the next runner up, IMO.

I will say this... ALL Ontario cities are horrible for the profileration of commie blocks. Even smaller cities like Kingston and Belleville have their fair share.

What's most troubling about the London case is that they're still building them en masse, and the city is not really building anything aesthetically pleasing in the core. For the proportion of new developments that are commieblocks, I'd have to nominate London as the winner, with KW in second place (horrid stucco student housing developments).

Not sure about western cities... Don't most western cities have most of their highrises in or near downtown? I know Vancouver has lots of highrise clusters around the metro area, but they're mostly condos.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2011, 7:48 PM
Highinthesky Highinthesky is offline
Beefeater
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: London
Posts: 379
It will always relate back to property values and they aren't high enough in most of Ontario'a communities to support development of anything other than stucco or Concrete monsters.

We could go flash-back and bring back the red brick monsters haha
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2011, 7:48 PM
The_Architect's Avatar
The_Architect The_Architect is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 3,385
St James Town for sure.. home of the Commie Block/Towers in the Park ridiculousness.




__________________
Hope is the quintessential human delusion, simultaneously the source of our greatest strength, and our greatest weakness.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2011, 7:53 PM
Highinthesky Highinthesky is offline
Beefeater
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: London
Posts: 379
Looks like you took a vacation to Moscow
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2011, 7:57 PM
Wharn's Avatar
Wharn Wharn is offline
Torontonian Refugee
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Oxy County
Posts: 982
Quote:
Originally Posted by flar View Post
Regent Park is gone
Thank God, that piece of shit was bad enough to make Kipps Lane in London look like the next Rosedale. Speaking of London...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cambridgite View Post
I will say this... ALL Ontario cities are horrible for the profileration of commie blocks. Even smaller cities like Kingston and Belleville have their fair share.

What's most troubling about the London case is that they're still building them en masse, and the city is not really building anything aesthetically pleasing in the core. For the proportion of new developments that are commieblocks, I'd have to nominate London as the winner, with KW in second place (horrid stucco student housing developments).
I'd agree with Cambridgite that London is bad for its continued construction of commie blocks, but when it comes to being the ugly slab capital Toronto takes the cake no problem. Blunderland and Oxford may be ugly as sin, but there is no way that we can compete with the likes of:

-St. Jamestown
-Parkdale
-Eglinton Avenue West
-Scarberia
-Eglinton & Don Mills
-Jane & Finch

Case in point:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2011, 7:58 PM
Wharn's Avatar
Wharn Wharn is offline
Torontonian Refugee
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Oxy County
Posts: 982
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Architect View Post
St James Town for sure.. home of the Commie Block/Towers in the Park ridiculousness.
Oh lol just realized we basically posted the same pic at the same time. St. Jamestown it is.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2011, 8:11 PM
flar's Avatar
flar flar is online now
..........
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 15,182
No city can beat Toronto in sheer numbers, but consider the number of commie blocks as a proportion of all buildings, and on a per captia basis.

London only has a few non-concrete highrises, and there are tons of them for a city of just 350,000. I'm pretty sure London has about the same (or slightly more) number of buildings over 12 storeys as Hamilton (505,000 city pop).
__________________
RECENT PHOTOS:
TORONTOSAN FRANCISCO ROCHESTER, NYHAMILTONGODERICH, ON WHEATLEY, ONCOBOURG, ONLAS VEGASLOS ANGELES
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2011, 8:15 PM
Cambridgite
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thank you for contributions to the tri-cities, Auburn (London developer).

Behind the Cambridge Centre (crane is for building #3).



Older pic



560 Queen Street South, Kitchener



These are just the ones I have pictures of. There are many more existing, under construction, or proposed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2011, 8:24 PM
Highinthesky Highinthesky is offline
Beefeater
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: London
Posts: 379
I was very dissappointed by 180 Mill St in London. I figured being in the same area as 695 and 675 Richmond it would be at least that tall but nope it is shorter.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2011, 8:31 PM
Cambridgite
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Jan 18, 2011, 8:53 PM
Wharn's Avatar
Wharn Wharn is offline
Torontonian Refugee
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Oxy County
Posts: 982
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cambridgite View Post
Thank you for contributions to the tri-cities, Auburn (London developer).
In the City of London, in the dive that was the Downtown core, the Dark Lord Auburn forged in secret a master Design, to get rid of all others. And into this Design he poured his cruelty, his malice and his will to dominate all skylines. One Commie Block to rule them all.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:01 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.