Originally Posted by kingchef
post #582 and the large photo of metro toronto are certainly worth noting. i've been to montreal on 3 occasions, loved the artichecture, especially the notre dame cathedral and the place known as fountain square, although the personal guide showing the four of our group was never seemingly certain, imo, and my french was learned as classical french over a period of 10 years, and i was for sure he didn't realize that we understood quite a good deal more french than he understood english. i think you learn so much just through life's experiences, that you just can't catch in the classroom---and we always earned a's. the dialect, the colloquiums, local customs, etc., put a spin on everything from language to food to dress. the same is true w/ how friendly the village and towns folk are in the regions, an e.g. british columbia, vancouver, regina and the province of Saskatchewan. vancouver people seem to be so w/drawn, while those in regina are more like those in the lower midwest and perhaps parts of of south, such as central kentucky.
i have been to toronto on about two occasions, until recently. the photo shown in this post is really pretty. the distance shots really show the apparent density of the city or at least the metro area, even if it is not all claimed as toronto. it is a big city, imo, though i hear some say otherwise. to me it is impressively clean and the architecture is really appealing to me. the needle is another interesting feature. i only had 5 days, and that was by pure accident. the time for sight-seeing was very limitied, due to the size of the city. to me, it reminds me of a canadian chicago, only bigger. nonetheless, it is a new place for a long visit, and it represents well for canada. people seem to rave about vancouver, which i think is very russian-looking, especially in many of the living tenant buildings. however, many tell me that montreal is a dive, but i don't see that at all. i guess it takes all kinds. again, enjoyed the photos. kingchef
|