HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #161  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2014, 7:45 PM
Syndic's Avatar
Syndic Syndic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,945
Awesome. I gotta see this.
__________________
Anti-Leslie Pool. Bury I-35! Make The Domain public!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #162  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2014, 8:01 PM
ATXboom ATXboom is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plaid Shirts View Post
Question for all you Austin people.

I live in Salt Lake City. Here, we always hear about how Austin is booming, growing, how it has such a young workforce and population.

With that, what is it about Austin that is making it such a booming, modern, hip city?

Also how is it that there is always skyscrapers being built? How much demand is there really for businesses and living in Austin.

Thanks!

Simplist answer I can generate...

Because of lax rules (open container, nudity, no real pressure on pot) in conjunction with the University of Texas... a lot of young people came here in the 60s and formed a big happy commune sort of feel. From that, a world class music (enterainment scene) developed including bar districts that compete with New Orleans, etc. All of this was happening in the Barbeque capital of the world... believe it or not there are tons of tourists that do BBQ tours - and its WORTH IT.

The city wooed Semetech here in the late 70's/80s and the tech based population boom began, fueled by the university (empoyee pool) and really cheap cost of living (transplants). Good corporate jobs (IBM, 3M) and venture capital firms followed (which make austin an entrepreneur/start up haven).

As growth occured, the large environmentalist population here (also attracted by the university and culture) really drove to protect some sensitvie areas (endangered species / drinking water source) which limited sprawl unlike Houston or Dallas.

Around 2000, a few progressive people organized massive events that draw 100's of thousands, like ACL, SXSW, Fun fun fun and now F1 and Xgames. Additionally, a solid convention center was built downtown. Those events, along with larger conventions started to expose the Austin culture to those visiting from other states/countries... that is when the highrise boom started.

The highrise boom is partly enabled by 2 progressive mayors' vision to put 25K downtown and 100s of thousands more into the urban core to appease the environmental voice/curb sprawl. They realized that culture attracts jobs - that's the secret sauce. More importantly, the demand side was/is driven by young peole seeking a fun culture in warm weather with lots of job opps that were exposed to Austin through the big events. Most of the people drawn to these types of events are from NYC, Chicago, California, and thus where most transplants come from. The type of events (type of people they draw) is a critical point - because of where they come/came from, they tend to seek an urban living experience.

The result - Austin has a 99% rental occupancy downtown, almost no supply of new condos, and the highest downtown hotel occupancy rate in Texas. So you see a ton of residential and hotel going up... an office building every few years. Interestingly, the 24 hour nature of downtown is starting to create more demand for downtown office vs suburban... it becomes a recruiting tool for companies located in the heart of the culture.

It's been a flywheel growth engine... amazing growth that seems to accelerate. Fantastic chefs moving to town, companies relocating... so the culture and job opps only get better and continue to increase demand.

The negative is that Austin is constantly trying to catch up to the growth... highways are choked and cost of living is now the highest in Texas.

This place will look like Seattle by 2025.

Last edited by ATXboom; Feb 7, 2014 at 8:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #163  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2014, 11:13 PM
GoldenBoot's Avatar
GoldenBoot GoldenBoot is offline
Member since 2001
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Terra Firma
Posts: 3,261
The question should really be why Austin has sustained popularity over the past 175+ years? It was popular before the 1960's/1970's when businesses began to recognize the city.

Austin (the metro area) has doubled its population every 20-25 years since the City of Austin was incorporated back in 1839. Currently, over 190 people a day are moving into the Austin metro area.

Very simply put, it's a combination of: location (including climate and topography); the seat of government for one of the economic powers of the world (The State of Texas); no state income tax; highly educated population and workforce; a seat for entrepreneurship; its citizens are young, vibrant, physically active; etc., etc., etc.

As the door continues open for more international visitors and investors, the ceiling has risen for how much more this metro region can grow and prosper.
__________________
AUSTIN (City): 974,447 +1.30% - '20-'22 | AUSTIN MSA (5 counties): 2,473,275 +8.32% - '20-'23
SAN ANTONIO (City): 1,472,909 +2.69% - '20-'22 | SAN ANTONIO MSA (8 counties): 2,703,999 +5.70% - '20-'23
AUS-SAT REGION (MSAs/13 counties): 5,177,274 +6.94% - '20-'23 | *SRC: US Census*
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #164  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2014, 3:44 AM
NYC2ATX's Avatar
NYC2ATX NYC2ATX is offline
Everywhere all at once
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SI NYC
Posts: 2,450
Great summarization ATXboom. What's thrilling to me is that the land-rush around Seaholm and Shoal Creek really isn't even the last boom for the foreseeable future. Consider the following:

-Once most of the major development in that immediate area wraps up (what's been announced or we know of so far anyway), the Waller Creek tunnel project will be wrapped and operational, and developers will already have begun snatching up undeveloped or underdeveloped parcels left and right.

-Shortly thereafter, the additional parkland construction and refinement will come to pass. I expect that from later this year into 2015, several proposals around Waller crop up. This may also supplement and intensify development already in progress around Rainey and the creek mouth.

-When those projects are in full swing around 2016-2017, it is likely that the innovation district intended to be developed by UT east of the capitol will be physically in progress and may begin to merge with the Waller district and envelop the new Waterloo Park and the poppy (I love that poppy ).

By the end of the decade, we could have witnessed three to four entirely new or remade districts (and high-rise clusters) come into being. And of course I imagine that by 2020 there will be at least one urban rail corridor with shovels in the ground (if not already operational).

The main fear of many watching Austin's evolution is that at some point the population growth will plateau and supply of apartments and commercial space will outstrip demand, thereby scuttling any more general growth. But I feel that this is no longer something that anyone needs to worry about. There are enough fast-growth industries laying down new roots in the city (tech, eds and meds, innovation, art and music, food) that one can expect it will become a self-sustaining urban region for a long time to come.
__________________
BUILD IT. BUILD EVERYTHING. BUILD IT ALL.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #165  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2014, 5:31 AM
austlar1 austlar1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 3,432
Quote:
Originally Posted by StatenIslander237 View Post
Great summarization ATXboom. What's thrilling to me is that the land-rush around Seaholm and Shoal Creek really isn't even the last boom for the foreseeable future. Consider the following:

-Once most of the major development in that immediate area wraps up (what's been announced or we know of so far anyway), the Waller Creek tunnel project will be wrapped and operational, and developers will already have begun snatching up undeveloped or underdeveloped parcels left and right.

-Shortly thereafter, the additional parkland construction and refinement will come to pass. I expect that from later this year into 2015, several proposals around Waller crop up. This may also supplement and intensify development already in progress around Rainey and the creek mouth.

-When those projects are in full swing around 2016-2017, it is likely that the innovation district intended to be developed by UT east of the capitol will be physically in progress and may begin to merge with the Waller district and envelop the new Waterloo Park and the poppy (I love that poppy ).

By the end of the decade, we could have witnessed three to four entirely new or remade districts (and high-rise clusters) come into being. And of course I imagine that by 2020 there will be at least one urban rail corridor with shovels in the ground (if not already operational).

The main fear of many watching Austin's evolution is that at some point the population growth will plateau and supply of apartments and commercial space will outstrip demand, thereby scuttling any more general growth. But I feel that this is no longer something that anyone needs to worry about. There are enough fast-growth industries laying down new roots in the city (tech, eds and meds, innovation, art and music, food) that one can expect it will become a self-sustaining urban region for a long time to come.
The big new thing in the downtown area is likely to be the growth of the UT Austin Medical School and the adjacent hospital complex. This will likely be a source of many new and well paying jobs downtown and should increase demand for more housing in the area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #166  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2014, 4:08 AM
ahealy's Avatar
ahealy ahealy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Antonio / Austin
Posts: 2,565
Amoa

As I was driving up Congress today I noticed a sign where AMOA used to be....y'know, that giant prime retail spot. Well, it's now a 7-11. Great job, DANA
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #167  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2014, 4:51 AM
JoninATX JoninATX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The ATX
Posts: 3,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahealy View Post
As I was driving up Congress today I noticed a sign where AMOA used to be....y'know, that giant prime retail spot. Well, it's now a 7-11. Great job, DANA
That's cool, another 7-11 for Congress Avenue.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #168  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2014, 6:23 AM
ahealy's Avatar
ahealy ahealy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Antonio / Austin
Posts: 2,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoninATX View Post
That's cool, another 7-11 for Congress Avenue.
Yes. I was really worried when we just had the one next to royal blue grocery...I am so relieved we now have 2 within 2 blocks (on the same side of the street)! Austin is really fostering a diverse selection of retail for our main street. Again, great job DANA!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #169  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2014, 7:08 AM
migol24 migol24 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Francisco, Austin
Posts: 1,603
Sorry for stupid question. What is DANA?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #170  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2014, 7:17 AM
Jdawgboy's Avatar
Jdawgboy Jdawgboy is offline
Representing the ATX!!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 5,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by migol24 View Post
Sorry for stupid question. What is DANA?
Downtown Austin Neighborhood Association.
__________________
"GOOD TIMES!!!" Jerri Blank (Strangers With Candy)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #171  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2014, 7:51 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin <------------> Birmingham?
Posts: 57,327
Isn't that the fifth 7-11 in downtown? I know there's another one along Lamar near 9th Street or thereabouts and one near 15th & Guadalupe, and and another one at 18th & Guadalupe. There's even another one at 26th & Guadalupe, (technically outside of downtown), but still in the UT/West Campus area.
__________________
Conform or be cast out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #172  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2014, 7:57 AM
migol24 migol24 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Francisco, Austin
Posts: 1,603
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jdawgboy View Post
Downtown Austin Neighborhood Association.
How do I get involved? How does anybody get involved to have a say on what gets shot down or not? Just the citizens living there?

On those meetings you guys have taking photos, do you guys also talk about getting more involved in city development plans? Because its not just the 7-11 that I find irksome, its also the Starbucks. Downtown should be preserved as it is the best neighborhood in town.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #173  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2014, 4:07 PM
MichaelB MichaelB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: North edge of Downtown
Posts: 3,208
Re: 7-11. I was so pissed when I saw that. We were walking past it this weekend and I was truly embarassed that what used to be a space for Art was not a space for "LCD" retail. ( Lowest common denominator). Unfortunatley, bitch as I may, 7-11 would not put a store there if their experiece proved it would not be fruitful. So, the real issue is that downtown obviously needs more "grocery" outlets…. and 7-11 jumped on it.
7-11 was smart…. and Congress Ave gets a little more generic.
I do agree that more could be done to avocate FOR better brands and more local retail, but you can't legislate who can rent…..or taste for that matter. It's the double edge sword of a town growing up. sigh.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #174  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2014, 6:42 PM
migol24 migol24 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Francisco, Austin
Posts: 1,603
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB View Post
Re: 7-11. I was so pissed when I saw that. We were walking past it this weekend and I was truly embarassed that what used to be a space for Art was not a space for "LCD" retail. ( Lowest common denominator). Unfortunatley, bitch as I may, 7-11 would not put a store there if their experiece proved it would not be fruitful. So, the real issue is that downtown obviously needs more "grocery" outlets…. and 7-11 jumped on it.
7-11 was smart…. and Congress Ave gets a little more generic.
I do agree that more could be done to avocate FOR better brands and more local retail, but you can't legislate who can rent…..or taste for that matter. It's the double edge sword of a town growing up. sigh.
how is san francisco able to keep starbucks, or any chain stores, from opening up in neighborhoods like the mission, castro, etc? does downtown work a bit different from other neighborhoods?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #175  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2014, 7:28 PM
tie_guy's Avatar
tie_guy tie_guy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 180
Quote:
Originally Posted by migol24 View Post
how is san francisco able to keep starbucks, or any chain stores, from opening up in neighborhoods like the mission, castro, etc? does downtown work a bit different from other neighborhoods?
Hmmmm... Not sure how that works, but I was in San Francisco a few months ago and there was for sure a Starbucks in the Castro. Right on Castro St, I believe. I didn't see any in the Mission, however.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #176  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2014, 7:51 PM
austlar1 austlar1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 3,432
Quote:
Originally Posted by tie_guy View Post
Hmmmm... Not sure how that works, but I was in San Francisco a few months ago and there was for sure a Starbucks in the Castro. Right on Castro St, I believe. I didn't see any in the Mission, however.
Looks like there are at leasrt 60 Starbucks within the city of San Francisco, most of them are east of Twin Peaks. The map is interactive. Scroll to the west and more stores pop up.

http://www.starbucks.com/store-locat...san%20fracisco
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #177  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2014, 8:07 PM
ahealy's Avatar
ahealy ahealy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Antonio / Austin
Posts: 2,565
The bottom line here is how much of a massive failure Congress Ave is right now retail-wise. We've heard reports from DANA that they plan to make Congress a "shopping destination"....for what? tall boys and marlboro lights?? I remember we were all talking about the possibility of a Target in the AMOA space. BUT 7-11?????! Somebody needs to be fired. I know I sound a bit dramatic, but seriously....theres brooks brothers and some tacky gift shops along with a few shitty restaurants north of 7th on Congress.

We are turing into a big city...and very quickly. I understand that it can't all come together at once, but the foundation that is being laid worries me.

ps. Not to crap all over DANA, but isn't it their job to select the proper tenants to form a habitable urban neighborhood?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #178  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2014, 8:15 PM
lzppjb's Avatar
lzppjb lzppjb is offline
7th Gen Central Texan
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 3,144
They are counting on summer Slurpee sales.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #179  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2014, 8:16 PM
austlar1 austlar1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 3,432
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahealy View Post
The bottom line here is how much of a massive failure Congress Ave is right now retail-wise. We've heard reports from DANA that they plan to make Congress a "shopping destination"....for what? tall boys and marlboro lights?? I remember we were all talking about the possibility of a Target in the AMOA space. BUT 7-11?????! Somebody needs to be fired. I know I sound a bit dramatic, but seriously....theres brooks brothers and some tacky gift shops along with a few shitty restaurants north of 7th on Congress.

We are turing into a big city...and very quickly. I understand that it can't all come together at once, but the foundation that is being laid worries me.

ps. Not to crap all over DANA, but isn't it their job to select the proper tenants to form a habitable urban neighborhood?
If it is not convenient for local residents to come downtown to shop, there is not going to be a real downtown shopping district. Michigan Avenue or Union Square are not tourist developments, although they attract lots of tourist shoppers. Core retail areas (the FEW that remain in US cities) are there first and foremost because they historically served the local population and somehow managed to continue to serve a local population. I suspect that Austin long ago became used to shopping in suburban and car oriented settings. Find a way for locals to drive (yes, drive, so go ahead and stone me!) and park conveniently downtown, and you might have some kind of revival of shopping in downtown Austin, especially if shopping downtown was perceived as cool and happening. Austin was still a very small city the last time Congress Ave. had any shopping energy, which was probably in the 1950s. As far as the DANA goes, I don't think they have any real or legal right to determine what tenants locate where in the downtown area. They may have some aspirations and opinions, but they are just an organization interested in the development of downtown Austin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #180  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2014, 8:35 PM
ahealy's Avatar
ahealy ahealy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Antonio / Austin
Posts: 2,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by austlar1 View Post
If it is not convenient for local residents to come downtown to shop, there is not going to be a real downtown shopping district. Michigan Avenue or Union Square are not tourist developments, although they attract lots of tourist shoppers. Core retail areas (the FEW that remain in US cities) are there first and foremost because they historically served the local population and somehow managed to continue to serve a local population. I suspect that Austin long ago became used to shopping in suburban and car oriented settings. Find a way for locals to drive (yes, drive, so go ahead and stone me!) and park conveniently downtown, and you might have some kind of revival of shopping in downtown Austin, especially if shopping downtown was perceived as cool and happening. Austin was still a very small city the last time Congress Ave. had any shopping energy, which was probably in the 1950s. As far as the DANA goes, I don't think they have any real or legal right to determine what tenants locate where in the downtown area. They may have some aspirations and opinions, but they are just an organization interested in the development of downtown Austin.
http://www.downtownaustin.com/sites/...owUp042910.pdf "Retail Uses/Storefronts
• More, variety, better mix
•More daytime uses More daytime uses
• More restaurant choices
• Continuous, engaging
storefronts
• Better merchandising
• Meld the storefronts with
public/private spaces"

^^So this isn't happening and it's my biggest concern. I guess that empty yarings space will probably become a gas station soon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:17 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.