Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonRad
I have zero sympathy for the enraged neighbours. I seriously doubt that any of them used the field recreationally at all. Perhaps some would occasionally walk their dogs there, but that would be about it. Some of these people may fantasize about turning the field into a community park of some kind, but who would pay the bill - the city???? The city needs tax revenue even to maintain the recreational infrastructure we have now, let alone build and maintain another green space.
I have a little more sympathy for the position of the Petitcodiac Watershed Alliance. At least their points about runoff from the impermeable surface of the parking lot make some environmental sense, but I'm sure compromises could be made in the design of the parking lot to mitigate this problem.
Don't get me wrong - I'm not generally a booster of surface parking, and where possible, I would prefer to see enclosed parking structures instead but I prefer pragmatism to dogmatism and the MHS redevelopment is far too important to the city to let die over the concerns of a dozen unhappy residential neighbours.
AN MHS redevelopment means hundreds of new well paying jobs for the city, in a portion of the city that badly needs an economic injection. There will be more stores and restaurants in the neighbourhood, as well as the arts complex in the old MHS auditorium and gymnasium. There are tens of millions of dollars of redevelopment money at peril here, not to mention the city's reputation as a "can do" development friendly jurisdiction. We can't let the NIMBYs win on this particular file.
I think L'homard is absolutely right here. If Heritage Developments walks away from this project, I truly believe the last best hope for preserving the MHS building will be gone. The next step will be a wrecking ball and another vacant lot - just what the city doesn't need.......
|
Firstly, at what point do you draw the line at usage? How many people will it take to use the green space before you say, "it's too well used to pave it over?" I suspect, the number is 1. Meaning, you don't care how many people from the neighbourhood use it, you want it paved over *for the greater good*.
Secondly, I don't think you live in that area, so how can comment how well used that green space is. If the plan doesn’t work out and the only option left is to tear it down, then so be it.
Joni Mitchell nailed it long ago with the Big Yellow Taxi song.
This mentality is the biggest problem in Moncton right now. To hell with what neighourhoods want/need. The greater good should/does override it. Unless of course, it is in your neighbourhood
I bet you dollars to donuts you do not live in this neighbourhood.
I bet you dollars to donuts you do not live in the Ellwood area either. So a Costco going there and destroying the traffic pattern means absolutely nothing to you.
I bet you dollars to donuts you do not live in the Sunny Brea area so council approving the new industrial part means absolutely nothing to you either.
I bet you dollars to donuts if the city wanted to build a Costco, a huge parking lot, or a new industrial park in YOUR neighbourhood, you'd sing a different tune.
fyi, I am not going to debate youor anyone else on these points, because you'll never come around.
I'm not saying don't build anything new, but stop with this destroying neighbourhoods for the sake of the almighty buck.