HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Calgary Issues, Business, Politics & the Economy


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2009, 6:18 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,446
Quote:
BTW, these towers could be readily built with existing technology and the savings on fuel transporation and harvesting costs alone would be worth the difference. That and being able to grow crops continually year round far outweigh any initial expenses.
I doubt both of these statements. It is cheaper right now to import tomatoes from the southern hemisphere than growing them in greenhouses locally. Transportation is really really cheap over very long distances, and heating is really expensive.

And greenhouses cost a lot less than towers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2009, 7:35 PM
O-tacular's Avatar
O-tacular O-tacular is offline
Fake News
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 23,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir.Humphrey.Appleby View Post
I doubt both of these statements. It is cheaper right now to import tomatoes from the southern hemisphere than growing them in greenhouses locally. Transportation is really really cheap over very long distances, and heating is really expensive.

And greenhouses cost a lot less than towers.
Emphasis on cheap RIGHT NOW. Back in 05-08 when things were crazy food prices inflated a huge amount due to price of oil. The entire rationale of this proposal is that you would have local, year round, cheap produce that would not only cut back on GHG emissions, but substantially reduce dependance on fossil fuels.

Second: heating would not cost a dime in these facilities because all the energy required would be produced on site by burning waste to generate electricity. These proposals are for self-sustaining, off the grid, production facilities.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2009, 7:38 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,446
If the point is that it would be cheap, wouldn't that make it that it would not have to be supported by government in anything but zoning?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2009, 8:14 PM
O-tacular's Avatar
O-tacular O-tacular is offline
Fake News
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 23,721
Yes. That is correct on paper. But we all know the effect NIMBY's can have on development of this kind.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2009, 8:30 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is online now
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,095
I don't see how one of the towers will ever be economical from the initial construction costs to the yearly maintenance at anywhere near current food prices. The tensile strength needed to support the farms is gonna take an incredible amount of steel and concrete and the humidity and water usuage will likely shorten the structural lifespan to 30 years. (unless they wrap the whole thing in rubberized roofing which would be a fortune onto itself and would need replacement in 30 years or less)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2009, 12:08 AM
Vascilli Vascilli is offline
Hare Expert
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Calgary, Toronto
Posts: 1,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wentworth View Post
^ Why bother raising ducks when there are so many big, fat rabbits in this city free and easy for the taking. Hasenpfeffer, anyone?
No, I don't think we'll be doing that..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2010, 8:21 PM
Surrealplaces's Avatar
Surrealplaces Surrealplaces is offline
Editor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cowtropolis
Posts: 19,968
Quote:
Originally Posted by Look way up View Post
Interesting article on urban farming. That wasted space in your backyard might be put to good use.

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/calgary/sto...lson-kile.html
Interesting idea, but I would be surprised if anyone could make a buck at it. I grow vegetables in my backyard, purely for fun, and I do get a decent crop, but it's a lot of work.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2013, 5:16 PM
monocle's Avatar
monocle monocle is offline
cow orker
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 437
There may be a better thread, but I couldn't find it...

If you are interested in heirloom/open-pollenated seeds and seedlings, then Seedy Saturday may be worth checking out today. It's at the Sunnyside/Hillhurst Community Association right now until 3.

I'd say there are about 50 booths with everything from worm castings to wildflower seeds.
My wife and I are selling chilli pepper seedlings, but there are also tomato plant sellers as well as all the standard veg that grows here.
Admission is $3

http://seedysaturdaycalgary.shawwebspace.ca/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2013, 3:41 PM
kw5150's Avatar
kw5150 kw5150 is offline
Here and There
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,807
Cool, great to see this here in Calgary.
__________________
Renfrew, Calgary, Alberta.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Calgary Issues, Business, Politics & the Economy
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:41 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.