Quote:
Originally Posted by SproutingTowers
By underwhelmed I guess they mean all the action is not located in one spot like in Nashville? Austin’s hotspots is scattered (SoCo, West 6th, Downtown 6th, East 6th, Rainey, and etc.) Nashville is a nice city where has tourist attractions like the Country Music Hall of Fame, Gaylord Texan, and Parthenon. Both have similar qualities as being a place for young people to party and hangout.
|
Nashville’s attractions are more spread out than Austin’s, so this logic does not track. All of the ones for Austin you mention are in town or adjacent to it and our only major tourist draw that isn’t happens to be F1.
Nashville does not have a Gaylord Texan (it does have the Gaylord Opryland), the Country Music Hall of Fame is downtown as is Broadway and the various components of the main entertainment area, while Church, the Parthenon, Music Row, and Vanderbilt are just outside of downtown, but the Opry, Hermitage, Belle Meade, are scattered. Austin has… Hamilton Pool, McKinney Falls, and a bunch of outdoor activities and nature that is also scattered, but so does Nashville — which has a truly effective greenbelt surrounding the western rim of the inner suburbs that also happen to be closer to the core than Austin’s offerings, which is an odd counterweight to my original point.
Edited to add:
Also, development is starting to throw the golden goose out with the bath water. Our entertainment districts are being gutted, while Nashville is preserving its low-rise character while still getting what is probably the second biggest boom in skyscrapers among the south mid-size cities now, second to only Austin. I often wonder when Richmond will see its day, lovely history in that town and stellar urban bones. Very similar in ways to Austin, Nashville, Portland, and Denver.