Quote:
Originally Posted by vid
This is from Thunder Bay's local news, not sure where they got their numbers from. It's been floating around Facebook for a couple days now. The things people are saying in response to it range from logical to absurd to terrifying.
The best (ie, stupidest) comment was that Toronto is the worst city for homicides because they had 57 of them and most of them involved guns. Thunder Bay's homicides just involved people's girlfriends, sons and boyfriends who had been drinking alcohol...
|
I want to take a second to laugh at Thunder Bay local news. Murders "Per Capita"? Do they understand that for a city to have 9 murders per capita, each person in that city would have to be murdered 9 times? Never mind the lunacy of something like "3.51 murders per capita". It's bad enough that each person gets murdered three times, but how do you 51% murder someone?
Their numbers are wrong too. Winnipeg had 25 murders in 2014, which actually leads to a higher murder rate per 100k people than their "per capita" number. And based on 35 murders, Edmonton's 100k rate is even higher than Winnipeg's. I can only assume they used Edmonton and Winnipeg's metro populations, which is exactly the kind of fuck up I'd expect from people who don't understand what per capita means.
It's no surprise the comments you're reading are stupid, vid, when dumb-dumbs like that put out the news. Mind telling me what station it was so I can personally make fun of the bone heads?