HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2081  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2022, 4:17 PM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,278
Quote:
Originally Posted by StoOgE View Post
Probably taking some of the Lamar money and moving it to Congress since that is currently FUBAR
That's not legal. Different pots. Congress is coming from 2020 Prop B. S. Lamar is from the big 2016 bond. Any "extra" money would shift to one of the other approved corridors and projects. It can't go go something outside of the initial scope.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2082  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2022, 1:56 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,589
Interesting stuff. I though the Bastrop studio was more of a vanity project, a one-off. But if this gets off the ground . . . we could be seriously clawing our way back to being a film hot spot.

Quote:
'Project Dark Monday,' a $267M, 820,000-square-foot film studio, to be considered for incentives in San Marcos

Another massive film studio project could rise in the Austin area.

The San Marcos City Council on June 7 will meet to discuss potential incentives for an 820,000-square-foot "state-of-the-art motion picture studio facility" at 6202 West Centerpoint Road in the La Cima master-planned development. Public documents indicate the project could include 12 sound stages, four workshops, backlots, production offices and a commissary.

Hill Country Studios, a subsidiary of Hill Country Group LLC, has proposed building the studio on 75 acres of a 209-acre-plot in three phases, starting in April 2023 and completing everything by 2025, according to council documents. Phase 1A would include seven production stages, two workshops and a welcome center, while Phase 1B would include 250,000 square feet of office space. Phase 2 would include five additional stages, two workshops and support space.

SNIP

The project would mark the second known massive film project in the Austin suburbs. The Bastrop 552 project, which owner Alton Butler has said will eventually have 486,000 square feet of studio space, 300,000 square feet of warehouse/mill space and 200,000 square feet of office space in a horseshoe bend of the Colorado River, remains on track to open on 546 acres near the city of Bastrop in August 2023.

https://www.bizjournals.com/austin/n...s-council.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2083  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2022, 2:22 PM
drummer drummer is offline
World Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Austin metro area
Posts: 4,503
Does Texas State have much in the area of film? I'm not familiar with that area. If not, what a great partnership that could be.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2084  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2022, 2:30 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,589
Quote:
Originally Posted by drummer View Post
Does Texas State have much in the area of film? I'm not familiar with that area. If not, what a great partnership that could be.
That's a good question. I don't know the answer, but you're right, it would be a great partnership. It also HAS to help push the state to re-examine all those expired incentives.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2085  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2022, 2:36 PM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,278
Quote:
Originally Posted by drummer View Post
Does Texas State have much in the area of film? I'm not familiar with that area. If not, what a great partnership that could be.
We used to until Greg Abbott became governor. There are some state house lawmakers (particularly one from ft worth) that has/had a huge boner for killing the incentives as much as possible. The commercial scene is decent in Austin but we lost an incredible amount of work to Louisiana and New Mexico and Georgia has been where all the growth is because of their great incentives.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2086  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2022, 3:00 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,589
Georgia's such a great example of incentives done well. They've turned production into a multi-billion dollar industry in their state. I'm constantly amazed that other states/locales don't model that approach more explicitly.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2087  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2022, 3:47 PM
drummer drummer is offline
World Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Austin metro area
Posts: 4,503
Sorry - I meant Texas State University for students.

That said, yes, the state should take advantage of a major industry wanting to play here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2088  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2022, 4:49 PM
enragedcamel enragedcamel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 492
Having a little knowledge around how the sausage is made (I have friends who work for state legislators), my guess is that it's at least partly because the Texas film industry is based in Austin, and state lawmakers kind of resent the fact that we already have tech located here, and don't want to increase the influence and economic importance of the city and its surroundings even more.

Not to mention that film people are heavily skewed towards liberal/progressive (whereas tech is more balanced).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2089  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2022, 5:47 PM
AustinYIMBY AustinYIMBY is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: AUSTIN
Posts: 97
I would imagine the fact that studios are setting up here, despite there being no formal incentives from the state, does not bode well for future incentives. The legislators (on top of the hatred of Austin mentioned above) have to be thinking “Why give them money when they are setting up shop here without it?”
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2090  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2022, 6:04 PM
lonewolf lonewolf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 546
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinYIMBY View Post
I would imagine the fact that studios are setting up here, despite there being no formal incentives from the state, does not bode well for future incentives. The legislators (on top of the hatred of Austin mentioned above) have to be thinking “Why give them money when they are setting up shop here without it?”
we have incentives. they are competitive.

https://gov.texas.gov/film/page/overview

remember to take everything you see on this site with a kilo of salt
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2091  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2022, 6:35 PM
AustinYIMBY AustinYIMBY is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: AUSTIN
Posts: 97
^Thanks for sharing that!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2092  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2022, 6:36 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,589
When Fear the Walking Dead announced its departure, there was some good coverage of the TMIIIP. The question wasn't so much the existence of incentives, but the amount of money the state has earmarked . . . which is small, and steadily shrinking.

This Austin Chron article from 2021 had a key quote:

Quote:
[W]ith only $50 million approved by lawmakers for TMIIIP for the 2020-21 biennium, and that figure shrinking to $45 million for 2022-23, Jensen said he feared that Texas is going to stop being competitive in attracting larger productions. He said, "This program is really wildly underfunded, and that we're losing projects so early in the two-year cycle is indicative that there's a huge amount of media production that wants to work in Texas, and we're not supporting that."
https://www.austinchronicle.com/dail...n-for-georgia/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2093  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2022, 6:46 PM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,278
Quote:
Originally Posted by lonewolf View Post
we have incentives. they are competitive.

https://gov.texas.gov/film/page/overview

remember to take everything you see on this site with a kilo of salt
How on earth are Texas incentives competitive with Georgia?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2094  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2022, 8:01 PM
Maximusx1's Avatar
Maximusx1 Maximusx1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 258
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinYIMBY View Post
I would imagine the fact that studios are setting up here, despite there being no formal incentives from the state, does not bode well for future incentives. The legislators (on top of the hatred of Austin mentioned above) have to be thinking “Why give them money when they are setting up shop here without it?”
Haha, what a crazy thing to think.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2095  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2022, 8:02 PM
enragedcamel enragedcamel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by freerover View Post
How on earth are Texas incentives competitive with Georgia?
Seriously. Care to elaborate, lonewolf? Or is it actually your posts that we should take "with a kilo of salt"?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2096  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2022, 9:07 PM
mtb_jeremy mtb_jeremy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 63
There is an option to ignore posts from specific users. If you click on the user name and view their profile, next to "send message" the drop down for "User Lists" offers the option to "add to ignore list".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2097  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2022, 11:22 PM
kingkirbythe....'s Avatar
kingkirbythe.... kingkirbythe.... is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,595
A big film studio is coming to San Marcos, but environmentalists are concerned about the location

https://www.kut.org/energy-environme...t-the-location

Hays County could be the next region in Central Texas to house a massive, full-service film production studio.

At tonight’s San Marcos City Council meeting, members are weighing what kind of economic incentives to give the company that wants to build it. But many are concerned that the proposed location is on environmentally sensitive land: a 75-acre slice of the Edwards Aquifer recharge zone.

Hill Country Studios is proposing to build an 820,000-square-foot film studio on land within the La Cima Development, a master-planned community west of I-35. The facility would include sound stages, backlots and space for production offices. Construction would start in April 2023.

A tax incentive is on the table that would position the city to refund a portion of the project's property taxes over a five-year period. The kickbacks would go into effect once the project is complete, which is estimated to be in 2025.

Cities often employ economic development incentives like this to make deals with companies that are willing to bring in well-paying jobs. According to city documents, the project promises to have 44 full-time employees by the time the buildout is complete.

Those in favor of the project say a film studio could be transformational to the area, providing jobs, attracting contract workers and stimulating local business. City documents also point to potential partnerships with local schools and opportunities for training and internships.

But many community members are concerned about such a large development on a crucial chunk of recharge zone. Recharge zones are basically open spaces of land that absorb rainwater and replenish the aquifer below. The Edwards Aquifer provides drinking water to a number of cities. It's also the source of the San Marcos Springs, which feed the San Marcos River.

Virginia Parker, the executive director of the San Marcos River Foundation, said the San Marcos River is the “lifeblood” of the town. Parker said the film studio’s economic impact would be great for San Marcos, but protecting the river should also be top of mind.

The nonprofit is encouraging the city to consider asking the developer to use conservation-minded development methods in exchange for economic incentives. One example is using porous materials when constructing sidewalks and courtyards, so that rainwater can still flow through the ground and into the aquifer.

“We just want things to be done really carefully over the recharge zone,” Parker said. “Once it's paved over, we can't undo that.”

Ultimately, Parker said she wants everyone involved to be thinking in a “protective manner” for the Edwards Aquifer and the San Marcos Springs.

"No matter who the builder or developer is, we want them to take extra care on the recharge zone so that we still have flowing springs in 100 years,” she said.

At the meeting tonight, the City Council will negotiate the terms of the economic incentives. The meeting will be held in person and streamed live at 6 p.m. Watch the meeting here.
__________________
UnitedStateser
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2098  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2022, 11:45 PM
kingkirbythe....'s Avatar
kingkirbythe.... kingkirbythe.... is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,595
Planet K owner sues Austin suburb over its ban on head shops

This isn't the first legal throwdown for the owner of the smoke-shop chain, who fought a protracted court battle with the city of San Marcos.

https://www.sacurrent.com/cannabis/p...shops-29070048

The owner of Texas smoke-shop chain Planet K Gift has sued the Austin suburb of Cedar Park in federal court, alleging officials there are unfairly wielding a city ban on head shops against it.

In the suit, Planet K owner Michael Kleinman accuses the city of trying to force the closure of his Cedar Park store by cutting off its water service and hounding it with complaints. He argues that smoking accessories sold by the shop are permissible because hemp consumption is now legal.

Since the store opened in November, Cedar Park has repeatedly hit it with complaints, according to a copy of the petition posted by news site MJBizDaily. Kleinman argues the citations amount to "intentional acts of harassment" to "force Plaintiffs to shut down Planet K Cedar Park because the city simply does not want a Planet K Gifts store in its town ..."

This isn't the first legal throwdown for Kleinman, who turned a late-2000s pissing match with the city of San Marcos over his right to display a junked vehicle turned into a cactus planter into lengthy court battle. It only ended when the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the case on appeal.

Kleinman also tangled with San Antonio in 2020 over the city's pandemic stay-at-home order, arguing his outlets should be classified as "convenience stores" since they sold items such as food and toilet paper.

Planet K operates more than 20 locations, including six in San Antonio, according to its website.
__________________
UnitedStateser
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2099  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2022, 1:20 AM
lonewolf lonewolf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 546
Quote:
Originally Posted by enragedcamel View Post
Seriously. Care to elaborate, lonewolf? Or is it actually your posts that we should take "with a kilo of salt"?
Georgia leads the country in tax incentives for film production. This has been a very successful, concentrated effort spanning a couple decades now.

If you want to label the 49 states that do not match their incentive package as "uncompetitive" then go right ahead!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2100  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2022, 1:42 PM
ATX2030 ATX2030 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 817
Titan Development plans industrial hub on 188 acres near Samsung factory

https://www.bizjournals.com/austin/n...ng-taylor.html

Justin Sayers – Staff Writer, Austin Business Journal
Jun 8, 2022 Updated Jun 8, 2022, 8:01am CDT

....Albuquerque, New Mexico-based Titan — which has an office in Austin and large industrial parks in Hutto and Georgetown that have attracted high-tech manufacturers — aims to break ground on Mega TechCenter by the end of year. Initial plans call for upward of 2 million square feet of speculative high-tech industrial space, with buildings ranging from 200,000 square feet to more than 1 million square feet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:49 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.