HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #941  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2019, 3:37 PM
PKDickman PKDickman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 557
Quote:
Originally Posted by west-town-brad View Post
was not LSE an old rail yard? like the 78 thing? or am I thinking of something else?

also the LSE developers are on the hook for a new public elementary school right? are the developers doing that out of the goodness of their hearts or what did they get in return?
TIFs didn't exist when LSE started. The TIF Act was only passed in'77 around the time the LSE PD was passed.

Chicago's first TIF, the North Loop TIF didn't come til ten years later
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #942  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2019, 1:17 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 13,887
^ Illinois Center was developed in the 70s, and a handful of residential towers along Randolph, but LSE (the Magellan mega-development) only began in the early 2000s.

They certainly could have asked for a TIF, but the previous high rises in the area would ruin the hypothetical “but-for” test.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #943  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2019, 11:15 PM
Tom In Chicago's Avatar
Tom In Chicago Tom In Chicago is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sick City
Posts: 6,394
With regards to LSE/New Eastside TIFs - I don't even recall Magellan ever talking about going to the city for TIF funding. . . separately with regards to the public school (I think someone mentioned it recently) I don't think they're on the hook for that. . . from what I recall the ball was in the Chicago Public School's court to decide if a school in the area was even warranted. . . seems like GEMs has - to some extent - fulfilled the need for a school in the neighborhood. . .

. . .
__________________
Tom in Chicago
. . .
Near the day of Purification, there will be cobwebs spun back and forth in the sky.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #944  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2019, 5:15 PM
PKDickman PKDickman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 557
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
^ Illinois Center was developed in the 70s, and a handful of residential towers along Randolph, but LSE (the Magellan mega-development) only began in the early 2000s.
But they would have been bound by the original PD. If it specified them doing it on their own dime, that would still be enforced.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
They certainly could have asked for a TIF, but the previous high rises in the area would ruin the hypothetical “but-for” test.
This is the problem. Developers aren't supposed to ask for a TIF, they are supposed to ask for money from an existing TIF.
The notion that developers could use their own tax payments as financing didn't occur to anyone until 2008 when they created the Weed/Freemont TIF to fund Grossinger Auto.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #945  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2019, 5:32 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 13,887
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom In Chicago View Post
With regards to LSE/New Eastside TIFs - I don't even recall Magellan ever talking about going to the city for TIF funding. . . separately with regards to the public school (I think someone mentioned it recently) I don't think they're on the hook for that. . . from what I recall the ball was in the Chicago Public School's court to decide if a school in the area was even warranted. . . seems like GEMs has - to some extent - fulfilled the need for a school in the neighborhood. . .

. . .
IIRC, Magellan would still be on the hook for building the new school... but Magellan and Ald. Reilly had indicated that CPS didn't have the budget to staff and operate it.

That always seemed like a too-convenient excuse to me, they were able to double the size of South Loop Elementary.

Of course, if no school gets built, then families with school-age children are probably gonna avoid LSE and go to other areas where schools are more convenient - even though LSE with its ample open space would seem to be ideal for kids vs. a more concrete jungle environment.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #946  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2019, 5:45 PM
Tom In Chicago's Avatar
Tom In Chicago Tom In Chicago is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sick City
Posts: 6,394
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
IIRC, Magellan would still be on the hook for building the new school... but Magellan and Ald. Reilly had indicated that CPS didn't have the budget to staff and operate it.

That always seemed like a too-convenient excuse to me, they were able to double the size of South Loop Elementary.

Of course, if no school gets built, then families with school-age children are probably gonna avoid LSE and go to other areas where schools are more convenient - even though LSE with its ample open space would seem to be ideal for kids vs. a more concrete jungle environment.
We have school aged children here in the East Loop but I see more in the South Loop. . . has to do with a) Jones College Prep b) British School c) Dearborn Park d) Roosevelt Road xfers and e) skateboard park at the south end of Grant Park. . . seems like the South Loop is a more well rounded urban environment for that than the East Loop. . .

. . .
__________________
Tom in Chicago
. . .
Near the day of Purification, there will be cobwebs spun back and forth in the sky.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #947  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2019, 3:36 PM
takascar takascar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 134
Any Updates?

Can't seem to find any information on a construction schedule for sub-projects in Lincoln Yards.

Do you think they are waiting for litigation to be complete before beginning work?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #948  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2019, 3:57 PM
Handro Handro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Chicago
Posts: 435
Quote:
Originally Posted by takascar View Post
Can't seem to find any information on a construction schedule for sub-projects in Lincoln Yards.

Do you think they are waiting for litigation to be complete before beginning work?
I've seen the RFP, site development should break ground next spring.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #949  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2019, 4:05 PM
Vlajos Vlajos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,134
Quote:
Originally Posted by takascar View Post
Can't seem to find any information on a construction schedule for sub-projects in Lincoln Yards.

Do you think they are waiting for litigation to be complete before beginning work?
What litigation?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #950  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2019, 6:00 PM
sox102 sox102 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 75
Quote:
Originally Posted by Handro View Post
I've seen the RFP, site development should break ground next spring.
Power has been bidding out some trades off of 75% Design Development drawings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #951  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2019, 6:53 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 13,887
Quote:
Originally Posted by sox102 View Post
Power has been bidding out some trades off of 75% Design Development drawings.
For what scope? Infrastructure or buildings?
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #952  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2019, 8:45 PM
sox102 sox102 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 75
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post
For what scope? Infrastructure or buildings?
The building on Parcel A.2
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #953  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2019, 8:50 PM
rgarri4's Avatar
rgarri4 rgarri4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 434
Updated flythrough from my 3d model of Chicago
Video Link
__________________
Renderings, Animations, VR
https://vizfire.net/
My 3d model of Chicago:
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/show...wpost&t=230331
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #954  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2019, 2:10 AM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
Leftist Correctist
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 6,276
__________________
Trumpism is the road to ruin
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:53 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.