HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2361  
Old Posted Dec 17, 2014, 8:16 PM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,367
DVRPC authorizes study for capping I-95



Quote:
DVRPC approved the City of Philadelphia’s request to spend $4 million studying the upcoming reconstruction of I-95 between Spring Garden and Broad Street, which would include looking at the possibility of connecting Penn’s landing with the rest of the city by capping I-95. The Delaware River Waterfront Corporation released a study in April suggesting that building a four-acre park over I-95 would cost approximately $250 million, but would generate $1.8 billion in economic growth.
http://planphilly.com/articles/2014/...m-william-penn
     
     
  #2362  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2014, 12:55 PM
jsbrook jsbrook is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Bala Cynwyd
Posts: 3,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by summersm343 View Post
DVRPC authorizes study for capping I-95





http://planphilly.com/articles/2014/...m-william-penn
Good news. We really need significant capping of broad swaths of I-76 and I-95 if the riverfront is to truly reach its potential. It may take a long time and cost significant sums of money. But hopefully it will happen gradually over time.
     
     
  #2363  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2014, 3:00 PM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,367
     
     
  #2364  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2014, 4:16 PM
VikingDutchman VikingDutchman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by summersm343 View Post
Would be amazing. I'm definitely in the camp that favors turning Washington Avenue into a grand mixed use district uniting rather than dividing Graduate Hospital and Point Breeze.

That said, my skepticism that this will ever see the light of day is about 98%. 0.5 parking spaces per unit? Would be amazing but there's no way that'll make it through the community groups and screaming old folks.
     
     
  #2365  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2014, 5:08 PM
jsbrook jsbrook is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Bala Cynwyd
Posts: 3,658
Another article on 2401 Market. Nice to see what promises to be more of a seismic shift in the vision for and about Philly:

http://www.phillymag.com/property/20...el-apartments/
     
     
  #2366  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2014, 5:49 PM
jsbrook jsbrook is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Bala Cynwyd
Posts: 3,658
The Versailles Apartment Building at 1530 Locust Street has apparently changed hands. Bought by Papermill JV, LP. Not sure if there is a gutting/refashioning/renovation in store. But there is a big union protest happening right now. Apparently, there was a mass layoff.
     
     
  #2367  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2014, 8:37 PM
josef's Avatar
josef josef is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Collingswood
Posts: 876
Speaking of things being bought, anyone see this?

"Seven Penn Center sells for $39M, major renovations planned"
http://www.bizjournals.com/philadelp...novations.html



Why is everyone buying up our offices right now? Not that I mind, but... this seems new.
__________________
South Jerseyist
     
     
  #2368  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2014, 9:16 PM
1487 1487 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by josef View Post
Speaking of things being bought, anyone see this?

"Seven Penn Center sells for $39M, major renovations planned"
http://www.bizjournals.com/philadelp...novations.html



Why is everyone buying up our offices right now? Not that I mind, but... this seems new.
I saw that. That building has a lot of vacancy now which is surprising considering its prime location.
     
     
  #2369  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2014, 10:05 PM
blart's Avatar
blart blart is offline
Fishtown & Country
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Philly
Posts: 508
From 12/18:

This seems to have popped up fairly quickly… 2nd and Vine:




The Penn Herb flagship is still crawling along, 2nd and Green:



The hole at Sugarhouse casino. Giant cement conduits, I guess for storm drainage. Or maybe a high speed line from the casino to the entertainment complex under construction across Delaware Ave?

     
     
  #2370  
Old Posted Dec 20, 2014, 6:48 PM
jsbrook jsbrook is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Bala Cynwyd
Posts: 3,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1487 View Post
I saw that. That building has a lot of vacancy now which is surprising considering its prime location.
If you stop and think about it for a second, it's really pretty incredible. Vacant lots are being developed all along our major thoroughfares, and subpar properties are being knocked down and replaced or at least given significant facelifts (1900 Market, 2401 Market, Gallery, etc...). In 10-15 years, we'll have a vibrant and attractive stretch of city all the way from Old City to University City!
     
     
  #2371  
Old Posted Dec 20, 2014, 7:44 PM
Philly Fan Philly Fan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsbrook View Post
If you stop and think about it for a second, it's really pretty incredible. Vacant lots are being developed all along our major thoroughfares, and subpar properties are being knocked down and replaced or at least given significant facelifts (1900 Market, 2401 Market, Gallery, etc...). In 10-15 years, we'll have a vibrant and attractive stretch of city all the way from Old City to University City!
Per the recent conference on Center City development, the emerging new conception of Center City runs from the Delaware River all the way out to 40th Street, essentially encompassing University City. And when you add on to that the burgeoning neighborhoods running both south and north of Center City (perhaps eventually stretching continuously up to Temple and beyond), . . . .

Well, let's keep our fingers crossed. Hopefully we're about to reach, if we haven't already reached, the necessary critical mass.
     
     
  #2372  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2014, 5:33 PM
Kidphilly Kidphilly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 923
     
     
  #2373  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2014, 6:01 PM
jsbrook jsbrook is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Bala Cynwyd
Posts: 3,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philly Fan View Post
Per the recent conference on Center City development, the emerging new conception of Center City runs from the Delaware River all the way out to 40th Street, essentially encompassing University City. And when you add on to that the burgeoning neighborhoods running both south and north of Center City (perhaps eventually stretching continuously up to Temple and beyond), . . . .

Well, let's keep our fingers crossed. Hopefully we're about to reach, if we haven't already reached, the necessary critical mass.
Here's hoping.
     
     
  #2374  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2014, 6:06 PM
jsbrook jsbrook is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Bala Cynwyd
Posts: 3,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kidphilly View Post
This will be great. It's disappointing such a small portion is being capped, of course. I think the cap will eventually expand a la a Boston-style dig. The city just refuses to spend the money at this time. In my opinion, the City should be devoting the bulk of its resources to capping and reconnecting the City to its Rivers. I'd much rather see money spent on this than projects such as redoing Love Park (I wonder what that is ultimately going to cost...). Let that come later. Particularly in light of the Dilworth Park renovation next door, Love Park can stay as it is awhile longer.

Last edited by jsbrook; Dec 21, 2014 at 6:19 PM.
     
     
  #2375  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2014, 8:45 PM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,367
Dalian on Fairmount

12/20/2014

     
     
  #2376  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2014, 4:31 AM
allovertown allovertown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsbrook View Post
This will be great. It's disappointing such a small portion is being capped, of course. I think the cap will eventually expand a la a Boston-style dig. The city just refuses to spend the money at this time. In my opinion, the City should be devoting the bulk of its resources to capping and reconnecting the City to its Rivers. I'd much rather see money spent on this than projects such as redoing Love Park (I wonder what that is ultimately going to cost...). Let that come later. Particularly in light of the Dilworth Park renovation next door, Love Park can stay as it is awhile longer.
I'd agree but capping 95 and 676 would cost far more than a Love Park redo. Besides Love Park's redo shouldn't be costing taxpayers much of anything. I believe the bulk will paid for by the owners of the garage located beneath the park. They need to do work on the actual structure of the garage and whilst doing these structural fixes they will also be making aesthetic improvements to the park itself. I believe the city will also be putting money made from the sale of the garage to the park.
     
     
  #2377  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2014, 12:32 PM
cafeguy cafeguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 346
Quote:
Originally Posted by allovertown View Post
I'd agree but capping 95 and 676 would cost far more than a Love Park redo. Besides Love Park's redo shouldn't be costing taxpayers much of anything. I believe the bulk will paid for by the owners of the garage located beneath the park. They need to do work on the actual structure of the garage and whilst doing these structural fixes they will also be making aesthetic improvements to the park itself. I believe the city will also be putting money made from the sale of the garage to the park.
Everyone keeps talking about an all or nothing scenario. They are capping a single part it 676 (the smallest). What if they did an additional analysis to ask, "what other sections would get the biggest bang for their buck?" or "What section might be the most important to cap in the next 10 years when construction continues to grow northward in the city?" They don't need to do a boston tunnel to make a better city.

They can't cap in front of the mormon skyscraper easily since there is an off ramp there, but the could cap the section in front of the temple without on or off ramps to help be the "conduit" or "connection" for what you might can "eastern-west-center city" with "south eastern callowhill/fairmount".

Then, they could cap between 10th and 11th for chinatown/callowhill/easerhood" northward expansion. OR, they could cap between 11th and 12th for the viaduct ease of access.

Realistically, we don't need EVERY hole capped to help make an improvement to the connection between north and center center city. Just doing these two extra caps would probably connect us enough to increase land values northward and make a better city.

Maybe instead of demanding a full analysis to cap everything, we plead for an analysis to add 1 or two more sections to the capping project.
     
     
  #2378  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2014, 3:27 PM
jsbrook jsbrook is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Bala Cynwyd
Posts: 3,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by cafeguy View Post
Everyone keeps talking about an all or nothing scenario. They are capping a single part it 676 (the smallest). What if they did an additional analysis to ask, "what other sections would get the biggest bang for their buck?" or "What section might be the most important to cap in the next 10 years when construction continues to grow northward in the city?" They don't need to do a boston tunnel to make a better city.

They can't cap in front of the mormon skyscraper easily since there is an off ramp there, but the could cap the section in front of the temple without on or off ramps to help be the "conduit" or "connection" for what you might can "eastern-west-center city" with "south eastern callowhill/fairmount".

Then, they could cap between 10th and 11th for chinatown/callowhill/easerhood" northward expansion. OR, they could cap between 11th and 12th for the viaduct ease of access.

Realistically, we don't need EVERY hole capped to help make an improvement to the connection between north and center center city. Just doing these two extra caps would probably connect us enough to increase land values northward and make a better city.

Maybe instead of demanding a full analysis to cap everything, we plead for an analysis to add 1 or two more sections to the capping project.
I'd like to see it all capped eventually and the highways rerouted underground where necessary. But I don't think it needs to be all in all at once. I'm ok with gradually capping the highway and rendering land adjacent to our rivers usable. It would make sense to me to conduct an analysis and focus on high priority areas first. Per Summers post, this is already happening to some degree. I.e. they are conducting an analysis on capping portions of I-95. (With respect to the immediate project...I'm not privy to all the numbers, but it does seem to me that they would have done well to cap a larger portion on this go-around when they are already spending money and already causing disruption).
     
     
  #2379  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2014, 8:00 PM
allovertown allovertown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by cafeguy View Post
Everyone keeps talking about an all or nothing scenario. They are capping a single part it 676 (the smallest). What if they did an additional analysis to ask, "what other sections would get the biggest bang for their buck?" or "What section might be the most important to cap in the next 10 years when construction continues to grow northward in the city?" They don't need to do a boston tunnel to make a better city.

They can't cap in front of the mormon skyscraper easily since there is an off ramp there, but the could cap the section in front of the temple without on or off ramps to help be the "conduit" or "connection" for what you might can "eastern-west-center city" with "south eastern callowhill/fairmount".

Then, they could cap between 10th and 11th for chinatown/callowhill/easerhood" northward expansion. OR, they could cap between 11th and 12th for the viaduct ease of access.

Realistically, we don't need EVERY hole capped to help make an improvement to the connection between north and center center city. Just doing these two extra caps would probably connect us enough to increase land values northward and make a better city.

Maybe instead of demanding a full analysis to cap everything, we plead for an analysis to add 1 or two more sections to the capping project.
Excellent points. Capping just a few of them could make a huge difference.
     
     
  #2380  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2014, 8:10 PM
Cro Burnham's Avatar
Cro Burnham Cro Burnham is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: delco
Posts: 2,396
great news at 16th & Fairmount

http://www.ocfrealty.com/naked-phill...16th-fairmount

This great old building has been a blighted mess since at least the late 70s. One of the few with a curved corner in the city. Thank you MM Partners. You put your money where your mouth is. More than can be said for the Divine Lorraine people a couple blocks away.

     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:36 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.