HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #261  
Old Posted Dec 20, 2022, 10:00 AM
libtard's Avatar
libtard libtard is offline
Dahvie Fan
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,273
My point is it doesn’t create any type of habitat and looks ridiculous
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #262  
Old Posted Dec 20, 2022, 8:39 PM
MIPS's Avatar
MIPS MIPS is offline
SkyTrain Nut
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kamloops
Posts: 1,790
It's funny you mention that.
Previously mentioned requirement to restore habitat on the site has been around for a while and there's a whole field of engineers who basically design renewal plans with fallen trees, various size rock and gravel and landscaping.
That wasn't a thing back when the Coquihalla was built so part of the watershed renewal was the construction of a set of artificial spawning beds. It's that set of ten square ponds south of Larson Hill. They are the most bean-counted basins they could make at the time without spending a lot of money and it's somehow one of the most successful watershed rehab projects in the province, even if it's not sculpted to look like a natural river.

How that survived the washouts last winter, I have no idea but that's all that is left of the original watershed renewal project.

Last edited by MIPS; Dec 20, 2022 at 8:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #263  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2022, 3:17 AM
Vantage's Avatar
Vantage Vantage is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Downtown PoCo, BC
Posts: 305
Quote:
Originally Posted by libtard View Post
My point is it doesn’t create any type of habitat and looks ridiculous
And you're a habitat creation expert? To me it seems as they decay they would add nutrients and act as nurse logs.
__________________
Vancouver born and raised | My Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #264  
Old Posted May 6, 2023, 4:29 AM
flipper316 flipper316 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 863
Drove the new interchanges sections recently. Was very surprised that the lane lines are already worn off or very close to. Now of course we know they cheap out here on the paint to appease the whacko environmentalists. Even so to have it fade away do quickly on a brand new section of road is a joke even by BC standards .Wonder if they'll at least put some cats eyes in.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #265  
Old Posted May 6, 2023, 7:42 PM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,186
I haven't been there in a while. Is the project now fully complete?

Last edited by Klazu; May 7, 2023 at 2:27 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #266  
Old Posted May 6, 2023, 10:26 PM
greenturnedblue greenturnedblue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 21
It is but there are still some pylons etc forgotten on the side of the road
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #267  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2023, 12:11 AM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
I've been thinking about a freeway-to-freeway connection between SFPR and TCH, again:

__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:46 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.