Quote:
Originally Posted by nixcity
^The link shows they will be ADDING a net addition of 800 new parking spaces. Although basically all that land is reachable by both the 2014 and 2016 routes....
Since I'm sure everyone has tuned this out anyway I will decide not even to read any more comments; because lets be clear, you are arguing for a plan that had its chance and failed miserably.
|
No, I'm arguing for professionals choosing a route based on sound science, not amateurs picking dots off a map.
I'm arguing for doing that investigation _before_ enshrining the route in law and passing a hundred million dollars in bonds.
I'm arguing for examining where transit demand is now, and in the future, not just defaulting to where we thought demand was 20 years ago.
Those sorts of principles lead to the 2014 proposal, but could lead to others. Even (to repeat myself) a G/L routing if soundly based.