Quote:
Originally Posted by BrownTown
Personally I find it silly that this building should have to show deference to a 90yr old building. The Chrysler building had its time in the sun. Allow progress to move forward and let other buildings take over the spotlight.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hudson11
If it were any other old tower, sure. This is the Chrysler Building we're talking about. It is beloved, and it deserves a higher degree of protection. Any other city would have view corridors up the ass for an icon like this.
|
I would put the Chrysler Building as one of the most recognized skyline icons in New York, but even the Empire State Building doesn't have protected view corridors. The Chrysler Building still will be visible from most angles anyway, regardless of whatever gets built here. However, we would hope that it's something that lives up to the iconic nature of the Chrysler Buildng, not to mention One Vanderbilt itself will be something of a skyline icon in its own right. Whatever is built here should be something that would bridge the two.
The Chrysler Building is nearly 90 years old, as old as the ESB and more of the classic skyscrapers Downtown like 40 Wall and 70 Pine Street. Even the Woolworth is still an icon after all these years and loss of dominance. No amount of new buildings around them will diminish that. In the case of the Chrysler Building, you actually need something much taller so the towers won't cancel each other out.
This building is also surrounded on all sides by
designated landmarks, so there will be a lot of discussion about what goes up here. Also, they're planning to put a new Hyatt here, which would probably be for the upper floors. That would give eye popping views of the Chrysler Buildng.
