Quote:
Originally Posted by jsbrook
This is stupid. In my opinion, exterior preservation and interior preservation are different things. I think it should be a harder showing for interior preservation, i.e. it's not required unless there is clear evidence that a viable use can be made while satisfying it. I think there are far fewer situations where there are viable uses that can protect interior uses. So this leaves us with a bunch of beautiful but rotting old buildings that will eventually fall into such disrepair that they must be demolished.
|
Why should they get public money from a program for which they clearly did not meet the criteria?