View Single Post
  #17  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2022, 3:26 AM
C. C. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,018
Quote:
Originally Posted by edale View Post
Much of existing lower Manhattan is fill. It's hardly a new concept...

Right. I've never said it was a new concept. There have been feasible proposals around for a hundred years to fill in the Hudson river for more land that could have been down for for around $17 billion in today's dollars.



https://www.6sqft.com/a-1934-enginee...c-and-housing/

A 1934 engineer’s plan fills in the Hudson River for traffic and housing

Quote:
In mid-20th century America–particularly in New York City–a roaring economy emboldened by our ascendant international stature filled many a scholar of public infrastructure with eagerness to execute grand ideas. This proposal to drain the East River to alleviate traffic congestion, for example.

Another ambitious but unrealized plan–one that would make it a lot easier to get to New Jersey–was championed in 1934 by one Norman Sper, “noted publicist and engineering scholar,” as detailed in Modern Mechanix magazine. In order to address New York City’s traffic and housing problems, Sper proposed that if we were to “plug up the Hudson river at both ends of Manhattan,” and dam and fill the resulting space, the ten square miles gained would provide land to build thousands of additional buildings, as well as to add streets and twice the number of avenues to alleviate an increasingly menacing gridlock.
Reply With Quote