View Single Post
  #183  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2009, 1:59 PM
DIESELPOLO's Avatar
DIESELPOLO DIESELPOLO is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 654
Counterpoint.

Quote:
Originally Posted by theWatusi View Post
I think I didn't state my position clearly enough.

1. I'm for Philly Live! and the money it will capture from people attending sporting events.

2. I'm against the zoning board spending a lot of time reworking the "stadium district" to allow for residential/TOD when there are other parts of the city more in need or revitalization.
Well, I get what you're saying: North Philadelphia needs help with planning- but I'd argue more so with economic development. It's a sentiment that can be argued for a lot of Philadelphia neighborhoods (hello southwest Philly). That aside, the planning commission is charged with reworking zoning, which includes TOD designation, for the entire city. Philly Live! (< spare me with the exclamation point) is getting a lot of publicity because of where it is, and the type of investment from hotels and shopping it will garner; a fact that is not lost on the city. Ensuring that the influx of this new development is attractive and congruent with the city's long-term strategy for making Philadelphia a green city (i.e., walkable & ecologically sustainable), is indeed a pressing issue.

North Philadelphia doesn't necessarily have that kind of urgency. The need for preventing mass teardowns (to build strip malls) and the desecration of urban neighborhoods with suburban-styled houses faced with vinyl siding, is real, but North Philadelphia does not require the re-mapping of an entire area and rethinking of massive parking mandates.
__________________
It's a Sophie's Choice, really...