Posted Oct 16, 2019, 4:59 AM
|
 |
recession proof
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,584
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTLskyline
Thinking about it more, I do not think you are far off, however, I would say the US is only part of it.
It's clear that Anglo-Canada would not exist as is if it wasn't for the initial wave of Loyalist immigrants. They established the entity of English Canada.
However, I would say Anglo-Canada has another parent: Scotland. Anglo-Canada had a disproportionate amount of Scottish influence compared to say the US or Australia, both of which had much more English (from England) influence than Canada.
The people traditionally thought of as "Les Anglais" in Quebec were actually largely Scots. Think of some of the prominent anglo Montreal establishment names from the 19th century, and it is clear they were disproportionately Scottish: McGill, McTavish, Drummond, Redpath, etc And the English that were in Quebec were probably more likely of Loyalist background as opposed to immigrants directly from England (although the Molsons are an exception).
Interestingly, nowadays, there are probably just as many Quebec francophones of Scottish background as Quebec anglophones.
|
The Scots have been in Canada for 1000 years. 
https://celticlife.com/canadas-scottish-roots/
400 year's later the English and French still can't get along:
http://www.biographi.ca/en/bio/kirke_david_1E.html
Last edited by urbandreamer; Oct 16, 2019 at 5:10 AM.
|