Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban_Sky
Just because you can find buzz-word-heavy excuses to refuse to acknowledge or address any of the arguments which are presented to you, does not mean that these arguments are invalid or don't even exist. Unless you have the ability to debunk the article of the "Institute of Mechanical Engineers" which was presented to you this morning, every word you further contribute to this discussion is wasting precious lifetime of everyone bothering to read it... |
The fallacies are not buzz-word excuses, and it is correct to catch them in a proper debate. It is also correct to provide refuting evidence as well. So, a pox on both your houses
As for discussing what was in that article, I don't see a problem with allowing studies for a technology that will come online in a few decades. We have to think both short-term and long-term with our infrastructure anyway, and in a world where everything is in chaos, I personally would like as many options on the table as possible.