[Matthew]

That appears to be the site plan from the news I was talking about.

From what I've heard, tailgating in parking lots is more important. They have to consider the tailgating crowd that prefer parking lots near the stadium. Why can't they go with a low-rise parking deck with a rooftop area for tailgating? They can have storefronts along the base, parking on the lower level, and tailgating on the top level. It's more parking near the stadium, storefront revenue, and a tailgating area just as big as what is proposed now. It's also much better than a parking lot. I guess no one is willing to pay for it? It would be interesting to see how much potential revenue the storefronts, additional parking fees collected, and advertising screens along the side of the deck could generate toward paying-off any loans for this deck?