Prob never will never happen but I"d love to see Deerfoot be realigned over the river. The land to the east going north just before the river looks very suitable to use.
|
Quote:
Are they really creating an intersection at 10th Ave And 14th Street? Will this be a bridge over 14th Street? That would be great if its true, it makes more sense to drive down 10th Ave to get to Bow Trail. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
What the hell??!!
http://www.transportation.alberta.ca.../stcrow-m2.pdf Sorry for the language, but this has to be one of the worst-designed interchanges in Alberta. What a waste of space! Also, the weave zones on Crowchild may be a problem. |
Quote:
That, plus noise abatement. No one wants to live right next to a freeway, and we've seen time and again what that does to local property. Having some semi-natural greenspace around it is a fantastic idea that benefits everyone. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
This winter has taken its toll on the roads. Are they ever in bad shape. The potholes aren't so bad, it is the bumpiness of the frost heaves that has me hanging on to the steering wheel.
|
Quote:
Anyone on here have any knowledge of an updated ETA? edit: city website says: Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm actually surprised the potholes aren't much, much worse. Give it another year or two of frost heave like this, and hilarity ensues. |
Quote:
|
What happen in the suburbs, stays in the suburbs. They can keep their shitty design ideals. BLAH.
|
Quote:
Anyway, I did a rough estimate of the area affected by the grading of the entire interchange and it came to approximately 775,000m2. |
Crow/Stoney is basically a modified clover with an attempt to make the weave distances longer. Considering the land available and additional bridge costs, I think the traffic engineers screwed the pooch on this one. Wouldn't be the first time.
I foresee a massive rebuild in the future, similar to what Montreal is doing with some of their interchanges. The long nightmare which NW residents have had to put up with isn't over by a long shot. |
I'll agree with you that it's certainly an odd design, but I'm not going to denounce it as I haven't seen the methodology behind it (traffic numbers, level of service indicators, etc.)
I guess we'll have to see how it does once it opens before we can properly rage on it. |
I'm guessing that the Crowchild interchange is going to work just fine. I don't know exactly why they just didn't add some flyover ramps, but it should work.
There are no weave zones for the primary road. The weave zones for the secondary road are quite long. The number of left turners was probably low (relatively), making no reason to put in higher speed ramps. It's also probably significantly cheaper. Those are likely the reasons. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Looking at the interchange design, at least there are good acceleration lanes for traffic merging onto Crowchild to get up to spped limit. Also, speed limit is only 80 vs 100 on Stoney Trail, that would make a significant difference in weave length I think. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 6:59 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.